![]() | Illinois Freedom of Information Act has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 1, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after
Illinois overhauled
its Freedom of Information Act on January 1, 2010, the law became regarded as one of the most liberal public-records statutes in the United States? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Freedom of Information Act (Illinois) was copied or moved into Illinois Public Access Counselor with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
11:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Created Moved to mainspace by
Edge3 (
talk). Self-nominated at
05:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Shushugah ( talk · contribs) 21:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
This article is basically a Good Article already, but I always try to find something to suggest for improvement. I don't have concrete suggestions here, but I am familiar with FOIA proceedings and I still found this to be a longer/more challenging read, because of how thorough it was, but the lede is an adequate summary of the entire body. So my only real suggestion is to remove one of the images. Sourcing consistency is not a requirement in GAN, but I noticed that some references are inside the citations section, creating inconsistencies, but perhaps I misunderstood it.
Thank you for improving one of the most interesting US state FOIA articles on Wikipedia! It was a pleasure reviewing! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Illinois Freedom of Information Act has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 1, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after
Illinois overhauled
its Freedom of Information Act on January 1, 2010, the law became regarded as one of the most liberal public-records statutes in the United States? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Freedom of Information Act (Illinois) was copied or moved into Illinois Public Access Counselor with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)
11:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Created Moved to mainspace by
Edge3 (
talk). Self-nominated at
05:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Shushugah ( talk · contribs) 21:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
This article is basically a Good Article already, but I always try to find something to suggest for improvement. I don't have concrete suggestions here, but I am familiar with FOIA proceedings and I still found this to be a longer/more challenging read, because of how thorough it was, but the lede is an adequate summary of the entire body. So my only real suggestion is to remove one of the images. Sourcing consistency is not a requirement in GAN, but I noticed that some references are inside the citations section, creating inconsistencies, but perhaps I misunderstood it.
Thank you for improving one of the most interesting US state FOIA articles on Wikipedia! It was a pleasure reviewing! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)