This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed an entire section which claimed that certain named people were engaged in illegal activities. Such claims are inadmissable without evidence that these people were in fact convicted in a properly established court. Eclecticology 07:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Moved from Stan's talk page as it is more appropriate to mention it here for discussion. ww2censor 02:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Discussion moved from Stan's talk page per his agreement. ww2censor 02:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Could you please have a look at this article. The article purports to recharactrize what was previously called "bogus stamps" as "illegal stamps". It makes reference to the work of the Worldwide Association for Development of Philately (WADP), an association which it claims to be affiliated with the UPU. The entire tone of the article seems highly POV, and I have already removed a section which claimed that certain individuals were involved in the distribution of illegal stamps without showing any evidence that they were ever convicted. I didn't want to go any further with this article without a second opinion. Eclecticology 07:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Not sure I follow this thread fully. I've revised the section, and heading, to what seems to me to be neutral. I'll remove the tag. I invite anyone to please identify specific words or sentences that you consider too biased. Thanks. HG | Talk 18:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Illegal stamps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed an entire section which claimed that certain named people were engaged in illegal activities. Such claims are inadmissable without evidence that these people were in fact convicted in a properly established court. Eclecticology 07:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Moved from Stan's talk page as it is more appropriate to mention it here for discussion. ww2censor 02:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Discussion moved from Stan's talk page per his agreement. ww2censor 02:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Could you please have a look at this article. The article purports to recharactrize what was previously called "bogus stamps" as "illegal stamps". It makes reference to the work of the Worldwide Association for Development of Philately (WADP), an association which it claims to be affiliated with the UPU. The entire tone of the article seems highly POV, and I have already removed a section which claimed that certain individuals were involved in the distribution of illegal stamps without showing any evidence that they were ever convicted. I didn't want to go any further with this article without a second opinion. Eclecticology 07:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Not sure I follow this thread fully. I've revised the section, and heading, to what seems to me to be neutral. I'll remove the tag. I invite anyone to please identify specific words or sentences that you consider too biased. Thanks. HG | Talk 18:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Illegal stamps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)