This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance). Derbyshire The article on Ilkeston United F.C. is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Thanks for reading! Hope you can understand more about our club. Ilkestonunitedfc ( talk) 15:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I am enquiring to change the state of this football club, since it is no longer defunct. A twitter account exists with the name 'Ilkeston United FC, @OfficialIUFC on Twitter, it's played a game before, and I believe the entire Wikipedia page with the name Ilkeston United FC should be completely transformed, similarly to the Ilkeston Town FC one. Blueilsonarmy ( talk) 14:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Not done: An X account does not count as a reliable source. See WP:TWITTER. If you can find reliable, secondary sources then we might have something to go on. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 16:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I have a video to show you featuring our team members. Blueilsonarmy ( talk) 19:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

So? That would not count as a reliable, secondary sources. I did dig a bit looking for anything to substantiate this and found almost nothing, and certainly no reliable, secondary sources. Without that, this is a complete non-starter. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply