This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Should have moved this over earlier, but here it is, psuedo-retroactively)
1. I put the following links to :es: articles within the text of the chronology:
2. I've seen one of his paintings titled both "Vispera de la Corrida" and "Visperas de la Corrida". I opted for the 1st of these for now. - Onceler 11:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
PS: A chronology section formatted like the one in the es:Gregorio Marañón, of bold years over bulleted life events would probably be easier to read than the current one--on my to-do list unless the question is mooted by further changes. - Onceler 11:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
3. The bulleted dates with mono-paragraph events -> bolded date/inidividually bulleted events change is done. It was not as time-consuming as expected but there sure ought to be a bot for this kind of thing (individually customizable or something) because everything I did could have had a pretty basic algorithm applied to do the same thing--at least in something like PERL. What began simply enough as a bid to translate something seems to be be dragging against the sandbars of format ambivalence, independent of language. What are the advisable conventions for chronologies/time lines?
Overall, bulleted events are easier to read, so bound-together peculiarities are more glaring when format is broken out/problems more inescapable, hence easier to edit. If anyone is aware of an existing thread/discussion on the same or related problems, I would definitely be interested. All these are pretty minute minutiae, but they'll look more minute in the rear view mirror. -thanks, Onceler 01:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Just a couple of comments on this article:
-thanks, - EN1-UTE- (Talk) 04:40, 23 May 2024 UTC [ refresh </nowiki> --> Onceler (Talk) (Mail) 17:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ignacio Zuloaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Should have moved this over earlier, but here it is, psuedo-retroactively)
1. I put the following links to :es: articles within the text of the chronology:
2. I've seen one of his paintings titled both "Vispera de la Corrida" and "Visperas de la Corrida". I opted for the 1st of these for now. - Onceler 11:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
PS: A chronology section formatted like the one in the es:Gregorio Marañón, of bold years over bulleted life events would probably be easier to read than the current one--on my to-do list unless the question is mooted by further changes. - Onceler 11:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
3. The bulleted dates with mono-paragraph events -> bolded date/inidividually bulleted events change is done. It was not as time-consuming as expected but there sure ought to be a bot for this kind of thing (individually customizable or something) because everything I did could have had a pretty basic algorithm applied to do the same thing--at least in something like PERL. What began simply enough as a bid to translate something seems to be be dragging against the sandbars of format ambivalence, independent of language. What are the advisable conventions for chronologies/time lines?
Overall, bulleted events are easier to read, so bound-together peculiarities are more glaring when format is broken out/problems more inescapable, hence easier to edit. If anyone is aware of an existing thread/discussion on the same or related problems, I would definitely be interested. All these are pretty minute minutiae, but they'll look more minute in the rear view mirror. -thanks, Onceler 01:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Just a couple of comments on this article:
-thanks, - EN1-UTE- (Talk) 04:40, 23 May 2024 UTC [ refresh </nowiki> --> Onceler (Talk) (Mail) 17:35, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ignacio Zuloaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)