![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's a publically owned company with 4k employees and growing. See monster, yahoo finance profile, glowing Juniper article (PDF) ( google html), CYNTEGRA controversy, Wright Reports profile, Google Finance page, Reuters' watchpage, Business Objects profile, PRNewswire story, Hoovers review, or take a minute to read the IDEXX webpage. Sometimes PR really is true...or maybe look at the business units map (PDF) for IDEXX. Somewhere along the way, a company with offices in over a dozen countries must surely graduate into "notable". Tom e r talk 01:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
As an employee, I probably shouldn't be doing too much editing of this article... Tom e r talk 01:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm trying to find the best way to provide articles and content to help update the IDEXX page objectively. I'll make some updates myself to the page -- but would appreciate any guidance along the way to make sure I stay true to Wikipedia guidelines. I see that IDEXX is a 'stub class' article now and I'd like to bring the company up a notch to 'start class'. One step at a time. Thank you!
Robinwoodcock (
talk)
20:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)robinwoodcock
I've removed the Cyntegra lawsuit stuff since it was not only given undue weight, it appears it was completely meritless to begin with (see the last line). Please discuss here prior to reinserting any of this stuff in the article.
Regards, Tomer talk 04:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's a publically owned company with 4k employees and growing. See monster, yahoo finance profile, glowing Juniper article (PDF) ( google html), CYNTEGRA controversy, Wright Reports profile, Google Finance page, Reuters' watchpage, Business Objects profile, PRNewswire story, Hoovers review, or take a minute to read the IDEXX webpage. Sometimes PR really is true...or maybe look at the business units map (PDF) for IDEXX. Somewhere along the way, a company with offices in over a dozen countries must surely graduate into "notable". Tom e r talk 01:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
As an employee, I probably shouldn't be doing too much editing of this article... Tom e r talk 01:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm trying to find the best way to provide articles and content to help update the IDEXX page objectively. I'll make some updates myself to the page -- but would appreciate any guidance along the way to make sure I stay true to Wikipedia guidelines. I see that IDEXX is a 'stub class' article now and I'd like to bring the company up a notch to 'start class'. One step at a time. Thank you!
Robinwoodcock (
talk)
20:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)robinwoodcock
I've removed the Cyntegra lawsuit stuff since it was not only given undue weight, it appears it was completely meritless to begin with (see the last line). Please discuss here prior to reinserting any of this stuff in the article.
Regards, Tomer talk 04:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)