This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Language Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophy of language Linguistics: Philosophy of language This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Does anyone have any idea what "(language "below" rather than "above" the context-forming horizon of the lifeworld)," is supposed to mean? Let us remove it soon. . . . Ace Frahm ( talk) 13:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply

The article currently does not cite any sources, so it is not clear whether this concept is notable enough for its own encyclopedia article. Please add sources.

For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. -- B. Wolterding 20:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC) reply

There is a reference now. Removing tag. Ace Frahm ( talk) 13:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply