This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Iapygians article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Iapygians spoke a non-Italic language", but they "were akin to Oenotrians, an ancient Italic people". Since Italic peoples spoke Italic languages, there is something wrong in the article, I suppose..-- 3knolls ( talk) 19:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Dear Βατο, could you move some parts of the /history/ section you have redacted in Messapic language to this article (perhaps those not directly related to the language), and/or help me improve the /history/ section in this article? Thank you. Regards, Alcaios ( talk) 22:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Their work is cited as a source in several articles concerning Iapygians, Messapians, Messapic language, etc. It caused major parts of several pages to be seriously altered by unsubstantiated claims, linguistic and ethnic classifications that are not supported by the scholarly, nor is there any evidence for them in the ancient sources.
The result is that we have several articles filled with dubious claims that not necessarily align with history.
Something that should be definitely examined. M.Basileus ( talk) 17:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The Pseudo-indoeuropean-theory is unproven and since years refuted. It´s a hoax. A fallacy. It`s ancient greek < helleno-pelasgian proto-hellenic ! 2A01:C22:34CA:CD00:184E:4078:BE15:E88B ( talk) 13:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Iapygians article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Iapygians spoke a non-Italic language", but they "were akin to Oenotrians, an ancient Italic people". Since Italic peoples spoke Italic languages, there is something wrong in the article, I suppose..-- 3knolls ( talk) 19:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Dear Βατο, could you move some parts of the /history/ section you have redacted in Messapic language to this article (perhaps those not directly related to the language), and/or help me improve the /history/ section in this article? Thank you. Regards, Alcaios ( talk) 22:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Their work is cited as a source in several articles concerning Iapygians, Messapians, Messapic language, etc. It caused major parts of several pages to be seriously altered by unsubstantiated claims, linguistic and ethnic classifications that are not supported by the scholarly, nor is there any evidence for them in the ancient sources.
The result is that we have several articles filled with dubious claims that not necessarily align with history.
Something that should be definitely examined. M.Basileus ( talk) 17:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The Pseudo-indoeuropean-theory is unproven and since years refuted. It´s a hoax. A fallacy. It`s ancient greek < helleno-pelasgian proto-hellenic ! 2A01:C22:34CA:CD00:184E:4078:BE15:E88B ( talk) 13:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)