This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
"He plans to leave the soap when his current contract runs out in september he says "The past 21 years have been brilliant, but i need something new to do. I want to thank Eastenders for everything and to the fans" The door will be left open for a return"
I have deleted this information as extensive research seems to suggest that this is incorrect.( StudentSteve 01:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC))
What needs cleaning? AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 21:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I have deleted this line "Ian's three marriages to trophy wives have brought little happiness" as it is a POV.
The whole article is badly written! seriously... can we have someone with a modicum of intelligence rewrite it please? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
81.156.105.52 (
talk)
15:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Should there be a 'Fourth Marriage' part made to follow up from the other sections or will we just add the bit about the wedding to the end? Sparhelda 20:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Is this section needed? It's only really about Lucy and Craig, not Ian. If it stays, it needs to be updated. I was about to update it when I realised it might not be needed. — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 18:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Ianandphilfight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:IanjiltsJane.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure someone has vandalized this article, the end of his story arch summary says he gets shot and dies this year. ;p 82.22.243.71 ( talk) 22:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
This article constantly irritates me, but I always shy away from trying to do something with it because it's so immense. I wonder if anyone else is on for giving it a makeover with me? The storylines are in need of cutting, tense fluctuates and the OOU stuff is sparse for a character of 25 odd years. Love to getit up to scratch but think i'll need some help. GunGagdin Moan 23:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
I love how brutal you are with storylines, Frick! But all the main points are there, so it's perfect! Anemone Projectors 14:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
OK, I'm opening this discussion to try and prevent the page from being locked for an edit war.
Someone has changed one of the paragraphs in the article to read the following:
"Phil blackmails Ian over his affair with Glenda but when Ian brings Phil the money, he walks in on Phil having a heart attack while with Glenda, so Ian takes revenge by not calling for an ambulance and leaving Phil to die. However, when he hears Ben asking where Phil is, he changes his mind and calls an ambulance. "
I've read the article from an outside point of view and I think that this should be changed to the previous revision that read:
"Phil blackmails Ian over his affair with Glenda but when Ian brings Phil the money, he walks in on Phil having a heart attack while with Glenda, so Ian takes revenge by allowing Phil to suffer and not calling an ambulance. However, when he hears Ben asking where Phil is, he changes his mind. "
The reason I think that it should go with the previous revision is because the previous revision makes it clear that Phil did not die. The revision that the IP wants to change it to does not make this clear, just because someone calls an ambulance does not mean that Phil did not die. Wikipedia is available worldwide and my concern with the revision that the IP wants to change it to is that people reading the article who are maybe not familiar with the character or with EastEnders would wrongly understand that Phil had died.
Please stop the edit war on the article, if it continues the page will be locked. Instead please discuss it here.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 00:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
For God's sake! How many times?? He left Phil to DIE! He HOPED that he would die from the heart attack, but CHANGED his mind after hearing Ben talking about Phil, and decided to save him. He left him for dead. Why can't you understand that? What is so difficult for you to grasp about this? 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 21:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
And what exactly is wrong with the description "Ian takes revenge by not calling for an ambulance and leaving Phil for dead. However, when he hears Ben asking where Phil is, he changes his mind and calls an ambulance, saving Phil's life."? 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 22:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
It IS necessary! He left a man for dead! It should be noted. 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 22:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Why not just remove the "leaves him to suffer" part and let it end with "Ian takes revenge by not calling for an ambulance" because he didn't leave Phil to suffer, he left him to slowly die of his heart attack. 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 02:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
I demand that the "allowing him to suffer" part be removed and I won't rest until it is deleted. I will fight to ensure that this part is removed as Ian DID NOT leave Phil to merely suffer, he hoped that he would die from the heart attack, that's why he refused to do anything for him. 78.145.121.132 ( talk) 11:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Although they haven't commented here before editing, I agree with Zepp900's edit. And yes, Ian did send the paramedics away. Though I still think this part will get removed in the future. – Anemone Projectors– 08:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Does tonight's episode mean their divorce was 100% finalised? Or is there still a decree absolut to come? – Anemone Projectors– 19:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Did his passport say 1 February, or did you (GSorby) just catch that it said February? Because this year he celebrated his birthday in the episode broadcast on 1 March - and he obviously has done so in the past because I checked and it already said 1 March. – Anemone Projectors– 09:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
This article could really do with a section on Ian's 2012 mental breakdown. Anyway, he talks about it a bit in this video. And we get to mention the beard. – Anemone Projectors– 09:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
I think Ian stole money from Lucy when he was trying to start up the restaurant but I can't really remember the conclusion of this. Is it worth mentioning this in the storylines? – Anemone Projectors– 12:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ian Beale. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Are the follwing relatives really relevant to Ian Beale?:
SamLaws81101 ( talk) 18:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm sure I remember him interacting with Tony, Ted and Sarah during the 90s, but I don't remember them having any storylines together. As for Bianca, I don't think Ian and David even acknowledge each other as siblings, as David never really knew Pete and was brought up by Pat and Brian. Ian and Bianca have shared scenes but I don't think they ever acknowledged each other as uncle and niece. The same goes for Liam, Tiffany and Morgan.
SamLaws81101 ( talk) 19:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ian Beale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ian Beale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
No sources have stated that Woodyatt has completely left Eastenders. Yet tons of IPs believe he has permanently left without providing any valid sources or information stating that it’s true. A source I found states he won’t return until May 2022, yet people lgnored that. WikiFlame50 ( talk) 10:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
In I’m a celebrity, he did not say he permanently left. He said they needed him to take a break, and the break got longer. WikiFlame50 ( talk) 23:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Bruh does nobody even care?! WikiFlame50 ( talk) 13:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
"He plans to leave the soap when his current contract runs out in september he says "The past 21 years have been brilliant, but i need something new to do. I want to thank Eastenders for everything and to the fans" The door will be left open for a return"
I have deleted this information as extensive research seems to suggest that this is incorrect.( StudentSteve 01:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC))
What needs cleaning? AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 21:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I have deleted this line "Ian's three marriages to trophy wives have brought little happiness" as it is a POV.
The whole article is badly written! seriously... can we have someone with a modicum of intelligence rewrite it please? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
81.156.105.52 (
talk)
15:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Should there be a 'Fourth Marriage' part made to follow up from the other sections or will we just add the bit about the wedding to the end? Sparhelda 20:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Is this section needed? It's only really about Lucy and Craig, not Ian. If it stays, it needs to be updated. I was about to update it when I realised it might not be needed. — AnemoneProjectors ( 会話) 18:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Ianandphilfight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:IanjiltsJane.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure someone has vandalized this article, the end of his story arch summary says he gets shot and dies this year. ;p 82.22.243.71 ( talk) 22:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
This article constantly irritates me, but I always shy away from trying to do something with it because it's so immense. I wonder if anyone else is on for giving it a makeover with me? The storylines are in need of cutting, tense fluctuates and the OOU stuff is sparse for a character of 25 odd years. Love to getit up to scratch but think i'll need some help. GunGagdin Moan 23:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
I love how brutal you are with storylines, Frick! But all the main points are there, so it's perfect! Anemone Projectors 14:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
OK, I'm opening this discussion to try and prevent the page from being locked for an edit war.
Someone has changed one of the paragraphs in the article to read the following:
"Phil blackmails Ian over his affair with Glenda but when Ian brings Phil the money, he walks in on Phil having a heart attack while with Glenda, so Ian takes revenge by not calling for an ambulance and leaving Phil to die. However, when he hears Ben asking where Phil is, he changes his mind and calls an ambulance. "
I've read the article from an outside point of view and I think that this should be changed to the previous revision that read:
"Phil blackmails Ian over his affair with Glenda but when Ian brings Phil the money, he walks in on Phil having a heart attack while with Glenda, so Ian takes revenge by allowing Phil to suffer and not calling an ambulance. However, when he hears Ben asking where Phil is, he changes his mind. "
The reason I think that it should go with the previous revision is because the previous revision makes it clear that Phil did not die. The revision that the IP wants to change it to does not make this clear, just because someone calls an ambulance does not mean that Phil did not die. Wikipedia is available worldwide and my concern with the revision that the IP wants to change it to is that people reading the article who are maybe not familiar with the character or with EastEnders would wrongly understand that Phil had died.
Please stop the edit war on the article, if it continues the page will be locked. Instead please discuss it here.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 00:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
For God's sake! How many times?? He left Phil to DIE! He HOPED that he would die from the heart attack, but CHANGED his mind after hearing Ben talking about Phil, and decided to save him. He left him for dead. Why can't you understand that? What is so difficult for you to grasp about this? 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 21:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
And what exactly is wrong with the description "Ian takes revenge by not calling for an ambulance and leaving Phil for dead. However, when he hears Ben asking where Phil is, he changes his mind and calls an ambulance, saving Phil's life."? 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 22:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
It IS necessary! He left a man for dead! It should be noted. 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 22:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Why not just remove the "leaves him to suffer" part and let it end with "Ian takes revenge by not calling for an ambulance" because he didn't leave Phil to suffer, he left him to slowly die of his heart attack. 92.26.201.184 ( talk) 02:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
I demand that the "allowing him to suffer" part be removed and I won't rest until it is deleted. I will fight to ensure that this part is removed as Ian DID NOT leave Phil to merely suffer, he hoped that he would die from the heart attack, that's why he refused to do anything for him. 78.145.121.132 ( talk) 11:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Although they haven't commented here before editing, I agree with Zepp900's edit. And yes, Ian did send the paramedics away. Though I still think this part will get removed in the future. – Anemone Projectors– 08:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Does tonight's episode mean their divorce was 100% finalised? Or is there still a decree absolut to come? – Anemone Projectors– 19:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Did his passport say 1 February, or did you (GSorby) just catch that it said February? Because this year he celebrated his birthday in the episode broadcast on 1 March - and he obviously has done so in the past because I checked and it already said 1 March. – Anemone Projectors– 09:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
This article could really do with a section on Ian's 2012 mental breakdown. Anyway, he talks about it a bit in this video. And we get to mention the beard. – Anemone Projectors– 09:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
I think Ian stole money from Lucy when he was trying to start up the restaurant but I can't really remember the conclusion of this. Is it worth mentioning this in the storylines? – Anemone Projectors– 12:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ian Beale. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Are the follwing relatives really relevant to Ian Beale?:
SamLaws81101 ( talk) 18:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm sure I remember him interacting with Tony, Ted and Sarah during the 90s, but I don't remember them having any storylines together. As for Bianca, I don't think Ian and David even acknowledge each other as siblings, as David never really knew Pete and was brought up by Pat and Brian. Ian and Bianca have shared scenes but I don't think they ever acknowledged each other as uncle and niece. The same goes for Liam, Tiffany and Morgan.
SamLaws81101 ( talk) 19:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ian Beale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ian Beale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
No sources have stated that Woodyatt has completely left Eastenders. Yet tons of IPs believe he has permanently left without providing any valid sources or information stating that it’s true. A source I found states he won’t return until May 2022, yet people lgnored that. WikiFlame50 ( talk) 10:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
In I’m a celebrity, he did not say he permanently left. He said they needed him to take a break, and the break got longer. WikiFlame50 ( talk) 23:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Bruh does nobody even care?! WikiFlame50 ( talk) 13:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)