![]() | I Wanna Have Your Babies has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed this section from the article because it violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. This section states that Beidngfield is one of the United Kingdom's "most prized singing talents" and that the song is a "great precursor to an album rumoured to be 'up there' with Joni Mitchell's Blue and Julia Fordham's Porcelain in terms of its emotional resonance and musical accomplishment."
These statements can be re-added to the article when they can be backed up by articles, interviews or reviews from reliable sources.
“ | ...presents a pathologically dark side of a relationship that the singer is at pains to conceal from the unwitting would-be father. This deeply psychological twist on the standard "let's be together" ballad is as uplifting as it is disturbing, playing with shades of dark and light, of relational obsession and unfulfilled (and unfulfillable) love. As well as striking a feminist tone, it marks a chilling return to form for one of the UK's most prized singing talents, and reveals a songwriting maturity that was only hinted at on previous releases. On this, her fifth single, Natasha overtakes older brother Daniel in writing songs of depth and meaning, and it is a great precursor to an album rumoured to be 'up there' with Joni Mitchell's Blue and Julia Fordham's Porcelain in terms of its emotional resonance and musical accomplishment. | ” |
-- Underneath-it-All 17:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Really great job everybody. This is an ideal article on a single.
This sentence gave me pause because it may go out of date (or sound dated) very quickly:
So far, the song has spent five weeks in the top seventy-five of the singles chart.
Try to stay away from statements like that. Otherwise, keep up the good work.-- Esprit15d ( talk ¤ contribs) 20:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
How high did it get in America? That should be included as this moves to FA status. Judgesurreal777 22:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. The lack of references in the second paragraph of "Music video" is a point of concern, but not enough so to delist. Lampman ( talk) 16:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
This has had a tag asking for references for the "Formats and track listings" for nearly two years now. These should be available. Could someone dig them up or the GA status of this article could be in jeopardy. AIRcorn (talk) 01:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I Wanna Have Your Babies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I Wanna Have Your Babies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | I Wanna Have Your Babies has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed this section from the article because it violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. This section states that Beidngfield is one of the United Kingdom's "most prized singing talents" and that the song is a "great precursor to an album rumoured to be 'up there' with Joni Mitchell's Blue and Julia Fordham's Porcelain in terms of its emotional resonance and musical accomplishment."
These statements can be re-added to the article when they can be backed up by articles, interviews or reviews from reliable sources.
“ | ...presents a pathologically dark side of a relationship that the singer is at pains to conceal from the unwitting would-be father. This deeply psychological twist on the standard "let's be together" ballad is as uplifting as it is disturbing, playing with shades of dark and light, of relational obsession and unfulfilled (and unfulfillable) love. As well as striking a feminist tone, it marks a chilling return to form for one of the UK's most prized singing talents, and reveals a songwriting maturity that was only hinted at on previous releases. On this, her fifth single, Natasha overtakes older brother Daniel in writing songs of depth and meaning, and it is a great precursor to an album rumoured to be 'up there' with Joni Mitchell's Blue and Julia Fordham's Porcelain in terms of its emotional resonance and musical accomplishment. | ” |
-- Underneath-it-All 17:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Really great job everybody. This is an ideal article on a single.
This sentence gave me pause because it may go out of date (or sound dated) very quickly:
So far, the song has spent five weeks in the top seventy-five of the singles chart.
Try to stay away from statements like that. Otherwise, keep up the good work.-- Esprit15d ( talk ¤ contribs) 20:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
How high did it get in America? That should be included as this moves to FA status. Judgesurreal777 22:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. The lack of references in the second paragraph of "Music video" is a point of concern, but not enough so to delist. Lampman ( talk) 16:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
This has had a tag asking for references for the "Formats and track listings" for nearly two years now. These should be available. Could someone dig them up or the GA status of this article could be in jeopardy. AIRcorn (talk) 01:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I Wanna Have Your Babies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I Wanna Have Your Babies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)