This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This commercial also aired for a short time in Massachusetts television markets when
Six Flags New England opened back in 2000
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
I Wanna Be Bad. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Where does [1] mention the cop(s) being in the backseat?
Hmm. I'm not sure how to reword this without causing confusion (e.g. if she kidnapped the officers, why couldn't they physically stop her if they were in the car with her?), so I'm going to source the timestamp for this one. At
2:42, you can see the officers in the backseat. It's a blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Add some more info to prose about the video other than a summary, like the doughnut incident
I had to cite the video again, but what I've added is basically all there is to it. It's not exactly a James Cameron movie.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't see a real team on Gazette Review's about page or anything else that indicates reliability, so what makes ref 7 a usable source?
I don't recall seeing it listed on
WP:RSP, but the "About Us" subsection established enough credibility for me since it's a legitimate job site and not a user-generated site where anyone can log in and edit, so I'd assume a site like this has editorial oversight. Willa's name is misspelled as "Will" a few times, but I've made that mistake several times before as, so I'm not sure what to think about this.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
13:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I have my doubts about findarticles.com being a reliable source for ref 8, or can you justify it?
It looks like a reposting of an August 2001 article from Girls Life magazine. I've checked several archives but couldn't find the original piece, so I added the original work to the citation and moved findarticles.com to a via parameter.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
13:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: I've completed the initial edits. Please respond to my comments where necessary, especially those in the References section, as if both Gazette Review and Girls' Life (via findarticles.com) are bad sources, a lot of information will be getting thrown in the dumpster.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
13:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
ResolutionsPerMinute Thanks for a quick and dedicated response; I have struck out any disagreements we had where a compromise was able to be reached! I am fine with ref 8 now you've explained findarticles.com is really a via domain, however anyone can send in a form for Gazette Reviews, meaning writers aren't necessarily professional, and RSP even says just because a source is not listed there doesn't mean it's reliable... anything else to justify this source's reliability? Regarding the as of date request, maybe 2007 would work because the archive says copyright 2007 at the bottom? --
K. Peake22:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: Okay, I've changed the year and removed the Gazette Review along with any information that was stated in it. Not a lot, thankfully. It looks like I'm all done here, but please point out if I missed something. And thank you for taking the time to review this article.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
22:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I've noticed that in a Hollywood Reporter icon she is described as an icon, but i feel like that's a really vague term that seems to mean nothing. She had one song that cracked a hit? I know it means things to certain generation and audience but the term "icon" seems so vague and isn't explained I don't feel like it warrants being here without some further detail as it feels a bit
MOS:PEACOCK-ish to me.
Andrzejbanas (
talk)
18:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This commercial also aired for a short time in Massachusetts television markets when
Six Flags New England opened back in 2000
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
I Wanna Be Bad. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Where does [1] mention the cop(s) being in the backseat?
Hmm. I'm not sure how to reword this without causing confusion (e.g. if she kidnapped the officers, why couldn't they physically stop her if they were in the car with her?), so I'm going to source the timestamp for this one. At
2:42, you can see the officers in the backseat. It's a blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Add some more info to prose about the video other than a summary, like the doughnut incident
I had to cite the video again, but what I've added is basically all there is to it. It's not exactly a James Cameron movie.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't see a real team on Gazette Review's about page or anything else that indicates reliability, so what makes ref 7 a usable source?
I don't recall seeing it listed on
WP:RSP, but the "About Us" subsection established enough credibility for me since it's a legitimate job site and not a user-generated site where anyone can log in and edit, so I'd assume a site like this has editorial oversight. Willa's name is misspelled as "Will" a few times, but I've made that mistake several times before as, so I'm not sure what to think about this.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
13:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I have my doubts about findarticles.com being a reliable source for ref 8, or can you justify it?
It looks like a reposting of an August 2001 article from Girls Life magazine. I've checked several archives but couldn't find the original piece, so I added the original work to the citation and moved findarticles.com to a via parameter.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
13:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: I've completed the initial edits. Please respond to my comments where necessary, especially those in the References section, as if both Gazette Review and Girls' Life (via findarticles.com) are bad sources, a lot of information will be getting thrown in the dumpster.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
13:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
ResolutionsPerMinute Thanks for a quick and dedicated response; I have struck out any disagreements we had where a compromise was able to be reached! I am fine with ref 8 now you've explained findarticles.com is really a via domain, however anyone can send in a form for Gazette Reviews, meaning writers aren't necessarily professional, and RSP even says just because a source is not listed there doesn't mean it's reliable... anything else to justify this source's reliability? Regarding the as of date request, maybe 2007 would work because the archive says copyright 2007 at the bottom? --
K. Peake22:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: Okay, I've changed the year and removed the Gazette Review along with any information that was stated in it. Not a lot, thankfully. It looks like I'm all done here, but please point out if I missed something. And thank you for taking the time to review this article.
ResPM (
T🔈🎵C)
22:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I've noticed that in a Hollywood Reporter icon she is described as an icon, but i feel like that's a really vague term that seems to mean nothing. She had one song that cracked a hit? I know it means things to certain generation and audience but the term "icon" seems so vague and isn't explained I don't feel like it warrants being here without some further detail as it feels a bit
MOS:PEACOCK-ish to me.
Andrzejbanas (
talk)
18:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)reply