General comment from a pop music editor. I already asked the nominator, however, obviously he didn't do my point. I Am... Sasha Fierce was edited from it's beginning by
Jivesh boodhun and he made 890 contributions on the article of course being its top contributor. The nominator
Hahc21 has not even made 10 contributions on the article. Obviously he even didn't credit Jivesh as second nominator. As for that I suggest a withdrawal on this nomination, as Hahc21 does not have the right to nominate the article. — Tomica(talk)18:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Sorry I was out to personal businness and completely forgot about this. Please excuse me, i have added Jivesh's name :) And actually, anyone has the right to nominate the article. I want the article reach GA status but not to say that i made it reach it such status. I now it was Jivesh, but as he's not editing too much, i decided to go and nominate it myself so it can reach GA status. —
ΛΧΣ21™06:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oh, and as a reviewer and common member of the GA review crew, i have to say this: The fact that the nominator is not the top contributor has nothing to do with this. This is not FAC boys. Anyone can credit themselves as helping improve an article to GA status. I have worked on some articles other people nominated to GA, and i just came in the review and helped. I didn't asked the user to withdraw the nomination, which i consider ridiculous even when i understand your point. I know Jivesh wrote the article to what it is now, but the mere fact that i nominated it doesn't mean i'm trying to overtake his work. That's not how this works gentlemen. Regards. —
ΛΧΣ21™06:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply
General comment from a pop music editor. I already asked the nominator, however, obviously he didn't do my point. I Am... Sasha Fierce was edited from it's beginning by
Jivesh boodhun and he made 890 contributions on the article of course being its top contributor. The nominator
Hahc21 has not even made 10 contributions on the article. Obviously he even didn't credit Jivesh as second nominator. As for that I suggest a withdrawal on this nomination, as Hahc21 does not have the right to nominate the article. — Tomica(talk)18:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Sorry I was out to personal businness and completely forgot about this. Please excuse me, i have added Jivesh's name :) And actually, anyone has the right to nominate the article. I want the article reach GA status but not to say that i made it reach it such status. I now it was Jivesh, but as he's not editing too much, i decided to go and nominate it myself so it can reach GA status. —
ΛΧΣ21™06:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Oh, and as a reviewer and common member of the GA review crew, i have to say this: The fact that the nominator is not the top contributor has nothing to do with this. This is not FAC boys. Anyone can credit themselves as helping improve an article to GA status. I have worked on some articles other people nominated to GA, and i just came in the review and helped. I didn't asked the user to withdraw the nomination, which i consider ridiculous even when i understand your point. I know Jivesh wrote the article to what it is now, but the mere fact that i nominated it doesn't mean i'm trying to overtake his work. That's not how this works gentlemen. Regards. —
ΛΧΣ21™06:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC)reply