This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to
alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
the project page and/or leave a query at
the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
I cannot see ref 20's content due to it being behind a paywall, but I know [21] backs up the first statement about strums so the ref(s) should be ordered in accordance with the prose (this can be done when it doesn't disrupt numerical order of refs, i.e on their first usage)
"meant to represent someone who's" → "meaning to represent someone whose"
"details Healy's struggle with" → "details Healy's struggles with" per the source
[26] should come before [25] per the order of the prose
Even though I can't view [20], a search for the word gentle seems to render no results
Source says: "... is as such a fitting note to end on, Healy’s gently devastating vocals rising on a wave of strings and through one humdinger of a key change before falling blissfully away to let a restless dream of...". Giacobbetalk16:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: I think I've addressed all of your comments. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Thank you for another quick and thorough review! I appreciate it. Giacobbetalk16:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to
alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
the project page and/or leave a query at
the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
I cannot see ref 20's content due to it being behind a paywall, but I know [21] backs up the first statement about strums so the ref(s) should be ordered in accordance with the prose (this can be done when it doesn't disrupt numerical order of refs, i.e on their first usage)
"meant to represent someone who's" → "meaning to represent someone whose"
"details Healy's struggle with" → "details Healy's struggles with" per the source
[26] should come before [25] per the order of the prose
Even though I can't view [20], a search for the word gentle seems to render no results
Source says: "... is as such a fitting note to end on, Healy’s gently devastating vocals rising on a wave of strings and through one humdinger of a key change before falling blissfully away to let a restless dream of...". Giacobbetalk16:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: I think I've addressed all of your comments. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Thank you for another quick and thorough review! I appreciate it. Giacobbetalk16:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)reply