![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:IRT Lexington Avenue Line. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
IRT Lexington Avenue Line. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on IRT Lexington Avenue Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC) – Paine Ellsworth put'r there 13:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Do not see enough agreement either way in this discussion. Perhaps if the issue of whether "Line" is part of the name or "line" is descriptive can be resolved, then we would know for certain how these articles should be titled? "No consensus" means that garnering consensus may continue at any time. Happy Holidays to all! ( closed by page mover) Paine Ellsworth put'r there 20:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
– Case normalize per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS and book sources. These are just the Avenue lines of the NYC subway; the rest will follow. In most systems, "line" is not part of a proper name. The navbox template Template:NYCS lines navbox shows the names without line. Sources don't usually cap lines. So per WP:MOS we should not treat line as part of a proper name and per WP:NCCAPS we should set the title in sentence case. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC) --Relisted. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 21:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kew Gardens 613 ( talk • contribs)
PS: All of the reasoning about "station" versus "Station" at the recent Village Pump RfC that concluded in favor of lower case also applies to "line" versus "Line". — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 22:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
The usage of the "XXX line" nomenclature in any way, uppercase or lowercase, is rare enough that the Google book results are negligible. It could go either way. I don't see any problem with the current name, or with redirecting your proposed titles to the current name. I personally use both—for example, Second Avenue Subway uses both uppercase "Second Avenue Line" and lowercase "Second Avenue line"—but I use the former when I want to refer to the specific, actual trackage, and the latter when I want to refer to a general line alignment that runs under the avenue. epicgenius ( talk) 23:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:IRT Lexington Avenue Line. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
IRT Lexington Avenue Line. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on IRT Lexington Avenue Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC) – Paine Ellsworth put'r there 13:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Do not see enough agreement either way in this discussion. Perhaps if the issue of whether "Line" is part of the name or "line" is descriptive can be resolved, then we would know for certain how these articles should be titled? "No consensus" means that garnering consensus may continue at any time. Happy Holidays to all! ( closed by page mover) Paine Ellsworth put'r there 20:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
– Case normalize per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS and book sources. These are just the Avenue lines of the NYC subway; the rest will follow. In most systems, "line" is not part of a proper name. The navbox template Template:NYCS lines navbox shows the names without line. Sources don't usually cap lines. So per WP:MOS we should not treat line as part of a proper name and per WP:NCCAPS we should set the title in sentence case. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC) --Relisted. Paine Ellsworth put'r there 21:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kew Gardens 613 ( talk • contribs)
PS: All of the reasoning about "station" versus "Station" at the recent Village Pump RfC that concluded in favor of lower case also applies to "line" versus "Line". — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 22:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
The usage of the "XXX line" nomenclature in any way, uppercase or lowercase, is rare enough that the Google book results are negligible. It could go either way. I don't see any problem with the current name, or with redirecting your proposed titles to the current name. I personally use both—for example, Second Avenue Subway uses both uppercase "Second Avenue Line" and lowercase "Second Avenue line"—but I use the former when I want to refer to the specific, actual trackage, and the latter when I want to refer to a general line alignment that runs under the avenue. epicgenius ( talk) 23:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)