![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:IRT Eastern Parkway Line. |
Does anyone think this article is too short? Besides, I think that the IRT Eastern Parkway Line and the IRT Nostrand Avenue Line should be merged into a new page, called The Brooklyn IRT. Or a disambiguation page should be created with this title. Need opinions!!! --imdanumber1 15:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the opinions, but I am still a little unsure as what to do. For all who thinks that the IRT Eastern Parkway Line and the IRT Nostrand Avenue Line should be merged into a new page called The Brooklyn IRT, type in Support along with a reason. For all who think it should stay the way it is, say Oppose along with a reason. For thse who think it doesn't matter what happens, say Neutral along with a reason. Don't forget to place your signature with a timestamp. I will take care of the moves and everything, but feel free to help. Your vote counts. Majority wins. Thank you! --imdanumber1 17:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC) P.S. Besides, the history won't dramatically be affected as all of the stations were added at the same time, mostly south of Atlantic Avenue. Maybe the move won't be as effective, but is up to you.
Well you are right about that. So the pages will remain untouched. -- imdanumber1 20:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
There were more changes over the years.
This infobox needs bullets. I've been trying to make one for this line, but my PC can't read *svg files, and my effort to conver the specific files screwed up all future *svg files, and now I can't change it back. ---- DanTD ( talk) 23:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IRT Eastern Parkway Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1999/06/15/1999-06-15_the_digger_clifford_holland.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1999/06/15/1999-06-15_the_digger_clifford_holland.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:IRT Eastern Parkway Line. |
Does anyone think this article is too short? Besides, I think that the IRT Eastern Parkway Line and the IRT Nostrand Avenue Line should be merged into a new page, called The Brooklyn IRT. Or a disambiguation page should be created with this title. Need opinions!!! --imdanumber1 15:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the opinions, but I am still a little unsure as what to do. For all who thinks that the IRT Eastern Parkway Line and the IRT Nostrand Avenue Line should be merged into a new page called The Brooklyn IRT, type in Support along with a reason. For all who think it should stay the way it is, say Oppose along with a reason. For thse who think it doesn't matter what happens, say Neutral along with a reason. Don't forget to place your signature with a timestamp. I will take care of the moves and everything, but feel free to help. Your vote counts. Majority wins. Thank you! --imdanumber1 17:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC) P.S. Besides, the history won't dramatically be affected as all of the stations were added at the same time, mostly south of Atlantic Avenue. Maybe the move won't be as effective, but is up to you.
Well you are right about that. So the pages will remain untouched. -- imdanumber1 20:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
There were more changes over the years.
This infobox needs bullets. I've been trying to make one for this line, but my PC can't read *svg files, and my effort to conver the specific files screwed up all future *svg files, and now I can't change it back. ---- DanTD ( talk) 23:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IRT Eastern Parkway Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1999/06/15/1999-06-15_the_digger_clifford_holland.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1999/06/15/1999-06-15_the_digger_clifford_holland.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)