This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
IPod Nano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that the Product Safety Scandal category be removed. Yes I've heard of Foxconn and I know there may be issues there. -- MarsInSVG ( talk) 15:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Due to its outdated model, Apple should have released an 8th generation iPod Nano. Its operating system is outdated. 2602:306:379D:1AA0:F1B5:3999:5FA4:A2D ( talk) 00:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
IPod Nano. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, all. I have split IPod Nano#Reception into two smaller sections, for better readability. Individual paragraphs now follow major timeline events (initial reception, screen durability problems reported, Apple acknowledges publicly).
The section on battery swelling potentially causing the screen to discolor or break is still problematic. I have tagged it as WP:OR for now, with citations requested. I'm sure that the swelling issue _has_ happened, for somebody, probably in early production runs, but there are no sources cited here except an iFixit.com repair guide for replacing the battery.
Because of the amount of time that has passed, and because there are no specific generation(s) mentioned as being affected, my (totally fallible) instinct would be just to remove that whole section. Please chime in if there are reasons why that would be a bad idea. -- Ernstkm ( talk) 14:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
There's a mistake. I think where it says about Apple donating$10 for each red ipod sold to the ProjectRed Initiative. It should be, Product Red /info/en/?search=Product_Red If that's the same thing. Seems to be anyway. Hardly matters i guess but I'm sure the Product Red people might appreciate the link to.. seems to be for a positive cause anyway.. 24.19.141.129 ( talk) 10:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
IPod Nano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1,
2,
3Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that the Product Safety Scandal category be removed. Yes I've heard of Foxconn and I know there may be issues there. -- MarsInSVG ( talk) 15:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Due to its outdated model, Apple should have released an 8th generation iPod Nano. Its operating system is outdated. 2602:306:379D:1AA0:F1B5:3999:5FA4:A2D ( talk) 00:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
IPod Nano. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, all. I have split IPod Nano#Reception into two smaller sections, for better readability. Individual paragraphs now follow major timeline events (initial reception, screen durability problems reported, Apple acknowledges publicly).
The section on battery swelling potentially causing the screen to discolor or break is still problematic. I have tagged it as WP:OR for now, with citations requested. I'm sure that the swelling issue _has_ happened, for somebody, probably in early production runs, but there are no sources cited here except an iFixit.com repair guide for replacing the battery.
Because of the amount of time that has passed, and because there are no specific generation(s) mentioned as being affected, my (totally fallible) instinct would be just to remove that whole section. Please chime in if there are reasons why that would be a bad idea. -- Ernstkm ( talk) 14:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
There's a mistake. I think where it says about Apple donating$10 for each red ipod sold to the ProjectRed Initiative. It should be, Product Red /info/en/?search=Product_Red If that's the same thing. Seems to be anyway. Hardly matters i guess but I'm sure the Product Red people might appreciate the link to.. seems to be for a positive cause anyway.. 24.19.141.129 ( talk) 10:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)