This page was proposed for deletion by MrOllie ( talk · contribs) on 6 September 2021. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I think this needs sections on top: relationship to ITIL CMDB
- comparison with physical memory allocation strategies in computing systems, similar problems of efficient usage of space vs. block size - support for VRFS / VLANS - SWIP records - resource usage - assignment - release - block management - address space utilization checking methods (ping sweeps, arp cache snooping, DHCP server log snooping, reverse DNS records)
- assignment of names - creation of primary and secondary zones - support for internal and external views - dyndns
- creation of configurations - DNS entry generation
- features around the upgrade of software and management of the IPAM system
RichardLetts ( talk) 23:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC) ---
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) Jenks24 ( talk) 06:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Internet Protocol address management →
IP address management –
I believe it's more commonly known by this shorter name.
Jasper Deng
(talk) 00:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't get why a subject matter expert is needed on this page? The flags don't make sense and seem old. If nobody has an issue I can remove them. Warren ( talk) 00:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Not sure how it fits into the table, but IPAM is a big feature of Server 2012 (see: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831353.aspx)
-- Operatorofhell ( talk) 08:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
I have re-added a template for third-party sources. This was previously removed, but the underlying problem was not addressed, which is understandable, since I did not explain the problem before.
Right now, no list entries have individual articles, and most entries are supported only by links to the product's own website. This is, functionally, using Wikipedia as a directory of commercial products, which is a violation of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Each product should be supported by a reliable source. A commercial product's own website is not presumed reliable, so independent sources should be favored.
The underlying problem is that there is no way to distinguish between useful products, and vaporware, scams, spam, etc. Since Wikipedia is not equipped to provide recommendations, we are by default presenting all of these products as broadly equivalent, but this comparison isn't supported by sources. References with external links to a product's site certainly can be included as a convenience, but the article should not WP:SYNTH these sources into a comparison table which isn't directly supported by any independent, reliable sources. Grayfell ( talk) 21:25, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
This page was proposed for deletion by MrOllie ( talk · contribs) on 6 September 2021. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I think this needs sections on top: relationship to ITIL CMDB
- comparison with physical memory allocation strategies in computing systems, similar problems of efficient usage of space vs. block size - support for VRFS / VLANS - SWIP records - resource usage - assignment - release - block management - address space utilization checking methods (ping sweeps, arp cache snooping, DHCP server log snooping, reverse DNS records)
- assignment of names - creation of primary and secondary zones - support for internal and external views - dyndns
- creation of configurations - DNS entry generation
- features around the upgrade of software and management of the IPAM system
RichardLetts ( talk) 23:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC) ---
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) Jenks24 ( talk) 06:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Internet Protocol address management →
IP address management –
I believe it's more commonly known by this shorter name.
Jasper Deng
(talk) 00:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't get why a subject matter expert is needed on this page? The flags don't make sense and seem old. If nobody has an issue I can remove them. Warren ( talk) 00:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Not sure how it fits into the table, but IPAM is a big feature of Server 2012 (see: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831353.aspx)
-- Operatorofhell ( talk) 08:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
I have re-added a template for third-party sources. This was previously removed, but the underlying problem was not addressed, which is understandable, since I did not explain the problem before.
Right now, no list entries have individual articles, and most entries are supported only by links to the product's own website. This is, functionally, using Wikipedia as a directory of commercial products, which is a violation of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Each product should be supported by a reliable source. A commercial product's own website is not presumed reliable, so independent sources should be favored.
The underlying problem is that there is no way to distinguish between useful products, and vaporware, scams, spam, etc. Since Wikipedia is not equipped to provide recommendations, we are by default presenting all of these products as broadly equivalent, but this comparison isn't supported by sources. References with external links to a product's site certainly can be included as a convenience, but the article should not WP:SYNTH these sources into a comparison table which isn't directly supported by any independent, reliable sources. Grayfell ( talk) 21:25, 24 March 2019 (UTC)