This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

This article is factually wrong about the sequence of events leading to the loss of the mission. I don't know if there is a politically correct mythology blessed by the spacecraft manufacturer and the Indian government, but I was the senior attitude control engineer on that mission and I know what happened. I corrected the article but my edit was reverted by bgwhite with no explanation. Let me leave it here since corporate, policy and/or insurance issues may be involved. Sooku ( talk) 08:33, 18 July 2015 (UTC) reply