This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page should be merged with the IND Sixth Avenue Line because as how it is seen by clicking here. Ned opinions. --imdanumber1 19:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
If you merge these, how could you not merge the Brighton Line connection under Flatbush Avenue which shares the same STRUCTURE with the IRT Line? -- Cecropia 22:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
If I don't get a justification against this soon, I'm going to have make major edit soon, and make sure no one undoes it. The 63rd Street Line was not built by the IND, the IND has been defunct since 1940. This article is very misleading, as an uneducated person would think this is an IND line. It was built by the MTA, it's far beyond unification, therefore a new subway line shouldn't be called IND. DanTheMan702 ( talk) 02:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
This must be one of the deepest cut and cover lines ever, if not the deepest.
How deep is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmassengale ( talk • contribs) 05:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
There's really no need for two separate articles for the same line. Epic Genius 19:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page should be merged with the IND Sixth Avenue Line because as how it is seen by clicking here. Ned opinions. --imdanumber1 19:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
If you merge these, how could you not merge the Brighton Line connection under Flatbush Avenue which shares the same STRUCTURE with the IRT Line? -- Cecropia 22:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
If I don't get a justification against this soon, I'm going to have make major edit soon, and make sure no one undoes it. The 63rd Street Line was not built by the IND, the IND has been defunct since 1940. This article is very misleading, as an uneducated person would think this is an IND line. It was built by the MTA, it's far beyond unification, therefore a new subway line shouldn't be called IND. DanTheMan702 ( talk) 02:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
This must be one of the deepest cut and cover lines ever, if not the deepest.
How deep is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmassengale ( talk • contribs) 05:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
There's really no need for two separate articles for the same line. Epic Genius 19:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)