This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Bradentonacademics.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand the resistance to adding the requested citations to this article. WP:V requires that all challenged material be attributed to a reliable source with an inline citation. If the material is as obvious as is claimed, it should not be a big deal to just add the cites. In addition, this article currently has no third-party sources backing up the material. Not everything needs to be drawn from third-party sources (though ideally it should), but some are certainly needed to establish that this team is actually notable. This is a problem with many other articles on third- and fourth-tier amateur soccer teams as well.-- Cúchullain t/ c 20:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:REDLINK, "Do not create red links to articles that will never be created". As I've said elsewhere, red links are allowed if they could "plausibly sustain an article", but there's no reason to assume all these amateur soccer players will someday be notable enough to have Wikipedia articles. They're certainly not notable just by virtue of playing for this team. It would be better to wait until a player actually becomes notable and has an article, and then linking to them here. If you're interested in tracking player careers, you can do that in project or user space, where it won't keep the article in a perennial poor state.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IMG Academy Bradenton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on IMG Academy Bradenton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Bradentonacademics.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand the resistance to adding the requested citations to this article. WP:V requires that all challenged material be attributed to a reliable source with an inline citation. If the material is as obvious as is claimed, it should not be a big deal to just add the cites. In addition, this article currently has no third-party sources backing up the material. Not everything needs to be drawn from third-party sources (though ideally it should), but some are certainly needed to establish that this team is actually notable. This is a problem with many other articles on third- and fourth-tier amateur soccer teams as well.-- Cúchullain t/ c 20:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Per WP:REDLINK, "Do not create red links to articles that will never be created". As I've said elsewhere, red links are allowed if they could "plausibly sustain an article", but there's no reason to assume all these amateur soccer players will someday be notable enough to have Wikipedia articles. They're certainly not notable just by virtue of playing for this team. It would be better to wait until a player actually becomes notable and has an article, and then linking to them here. If you're interested in tracking player careers, you can do that in project or user space, where it won't keep the article in a perennial poor state.-- Cúchullain t/ c 12:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IMG Academy Bradenton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on IMG Academy Bradenton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)