![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is not very encyclopediac - anyone working in the field isn't going to come to the Wikipedia for this information, which is very sketchy. It's an instant orphan; nothing links here except the recent link from hydroelectricity, to which this article is only peripheral. It sounds like PR by the IEC to sell standards documents...do we need to advertise IEC publications here? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 18:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I found this very usefull. As an unemployed EE I continue to study at home. Quick referene to terms like goose, quick goose and mirrored bits are great.
Old Gringo Stan (
talk) 17:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The more i see comments on Wikipedia, the more it looks like there is a tendency to throw out deeply technical areas, and a lack of value for expertise.?. I do think it is going to hurt wikipedia in the long run. Also, i think the thought process that for eg: Ethernet is encyclopedic, while the standard IEEE 802.3 is not encyclopedic, for it stands as a marketing effort for IEEE does not make sense, for one is the same as the other! Gp1973 ( talk) 18:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
== IEC 61850 Is a hot standard right now. I was happy and surprised to find it in the wiki. I am assuming folks who enter this valuable information have time on their hands....college folks, retirees and the unemployed. Old Gringo Stan ( talk) 17:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The links in the subsections "Compatible Devices", "Compatible Software Tools" count as product advertising links - referring to WP:WPSPAM. There is no need to link to salable devices or software and the link to the IEC 61850 Blog does also not contain information that is associated to this Wikipedia article (but advertisement links to the same company). X4nd1 ( talk) 23:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
The link "Projects with Smart Substation Solution" to a pdf is broken, the website seem not to exist anymore. Please put an archive or delete the link Thommy14 ( talk) 17:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on IEC 61850. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is not very encyclopediac - anyone working in the field isn't going to come to the Wikipedia for this information, which is very sketchy. It's an instant orphan; nothing links here except the recent link from hydroelectricity, to which this article is only peripheral. It sounds like PR by the IEC to sell standards documents...do we need to advertise IEC publications here? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 18:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I found this very usefull. As an unemployed EE I continue to study at home. Quick referene to terms like goose, quick goose and mirrored bits are great.
Old Gringo Stan (
talk) 17:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The more i see comments on Wikipedia, the more it looks like there is a tendency to throw out deeply technical areas, and a lack of value for expertise.?. I do think it is going to hurt wikipedia in the long run. Also, i think the thought process that for eg: Ethernet is encyclopedic, while the standard IEEE 802.3 is not encyclopedic, for it stands as a marketing effort for IEEE does not make sense, for one is the same as the other! Gp1973 ( talk) 18:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
== IEC 61850 Is a hot standard right now. I was happy and surprised to find it in the wiki. I am assuming folks who enter this valuable information have time on their hands....college folks, retirees and the unemployed. Old Gringo Stan ( talk) 17:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The links in the subsections "Compatible Devices", "Compatible Software Tools" count as product advertising links - referring to WP:WPSPAM. There is no need to link to salable devices or software and the link to the IEC 61850 Blog does also not contain information that is associated to this Wikipedia article (but advertisement links to the same company). X4nd1 ( talk) 23:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
The link "Projects with Smart Substation Solution" to a pdf is broken, the website seem not to exist anymore. Please put an archive or delete the link Thommy14 ( talk) 17:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on IEC 61850. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)