From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This is not noteworthy

i4i is just a patent troll company set to make money off obscure and unspecific/wide patent infringement lawsuits, for example i4i = an eye for an eye ,IMO this article should be deleted. It is also a stub on the epic level. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.18.128.243 ( talk) 03:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply

This is noteworthy because it is a patent troll. It shows the idiocy of trivality patents. It is an epic stub, though.-- Cyberman TM ( talk) 06:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Keep: If the courts award them $290,000,000.00 from Microsoft then that is, IMO, sufficient notability to keep the article. What would be useful is some description of what it is that Microsoft breached. -- SGBailey ( talk) 09:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply

i4i has clearly become notable. PK T(alk) 14:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This is not noteworthy

i4i is just a patent troll company set to make money off obscure and unspecific/wide patent infringement lawsuits, for example i4i = an eye for an eye ,IMO this article should be deleted. It is also a stub on the epic level. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.18.128.243 ( talk) 03:47, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply

This is noteworthy because it is a patent troll. It shows the idiocy of trivality patents. It is an epic stub, though.-- Cyberman TM ( talk) 06:23, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Keep: If the courts award them $290,000,000.00 from Microsoft then that is, IMO, sufficient notability to keep the article. What would be useful is some description of what it is that Microsoft breached. -- SGBailey ( talk) 09:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC) reply

i4i has clearly become notable. PK T(alk) 14:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook