A fact from Iñaki de Juana Chaos appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Due to the sensitive nature of the article since the subject is still living, we must be very careful with WP:BLP. Please do not add unsourced information to the article. Find references from the Internet (I suggest looking at references at the es.wiki article on Iñaki de Juana Chaos) and appropriately add them here. Thanks, Nishkid 64 01:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I will provide an anwer to just one point of difference as requested in third party opinion page, whether mass murderer is appropriate. First we need to find a WP:RS that calls him as such second it will fail WP:NPOV even if it is found. It is much more acceptable to call him as convicted of murdering number(give the correct number) of people. Then cite it properly. That will pass neutrality test. RaveenS 23:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
This article sucks the way it's currently written. The Spanish government does not convict anybody. It is judges or courts who convict. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.239.252 ( talk) 21:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
The La Haine source I have inserted is clearly not neutral but for the minimal use (names and dates) it gets should be enough. It however mentions cases where the Spanish government has yielded before strikers. If somebody can add a neutral source on those, they would be mention-worthy. -- Error 00:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
DumZiBoT ( talk) 17:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Several Wikipedia users have deleted all the information I have added. I have twice as many sources in my additions as they do in the original version they insist on restoring. As a matter of fact, they have deleted every pieces of information I have added since it presents substantial data about this person's biographical record that don't match the original article in which most of what he has done in his life was ignored. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Genericcoop ( talk • contribs) 21:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Please remove the following text from the "Prison sentence" section - "(Gallizo <ref>http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id25.html</ref> and The Shield <ref>http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id23.html</ref>)". As you can see it's a self-published tripod hosted site, and the rest of the sentence is sourced by the Times reference at the end of the sentence. Thanks. 2 lines of K 303 14:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Much of the information in the introductory paragraph is repeated again in the main section and I would propose that the introduction should be shortened. It would make the text read better because it would be less repetitious.
One man's freedom fighter ( talk) 15:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Iñaki de Juana Chaos/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Article might get volatile now that subject is back in the news; however, several substantial and well-cited subsections make this article B-class currently. - Fsotrain 09 02:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 02:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 19:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
A fact from Iñaki de Juana Chaos appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Due to the sensitive nature of the article since the subject is still living, we must be very careful with WP:BLP. Please do not add unsourced information to the article. Find references from the Internet (I suggest looking at references at the es.wiki article on Iñaki de Juana Chaos) and appropriately add them here. Thanks, Nishkid 64 01:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I will provide an anwer to just one point of difference as requested in third party opinion page, whether mass murderer is appropriate. First we need to find a WP:RS that calls him as such second it will fail WP:NPOV even if it is found. It is much more acceptable to call him as convicted of murdering number(give the correct number) of people. Then cite it properly. That will pass neutrality test. RaveenS 23:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
This article sucks the way it's currently written. The Spanish government does not convict anybody. It is judges or courts who convict. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.239.252 ( talk) 21:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
The La Haine source I have inserted is clearly not neutral but for the minimal use (names and dates) it gets should be enough. It however mentions cases where the Spanish government has yielded before strikers. If somebody can add a neutral source on those, they would be mention-worthy. -- Error 00:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
DumZiBoT ( talk) 17:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Several Wikipedia users have deleted all the information I have added. I have twice as many sources in my additions as they do in the original version they insist on restoring. As a matter of fact, they have deleted every pieces of information I have added since it presents substantial data about this person's biographical record that don't match the original article in which most of what he has done in his life was ignored. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Genericcoop ( talk • contribs) 21:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Please remove the following text from the "Prison sentence" section - "(Gallizo <ref>http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id25.html</ref> and The Shield <ref>http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id23.html</ref>)". As you can see it's a self-published tripod hosted site, and the rest of the sentence is sourced by the Times reference at the end of the sentence. Thanks. 2 lines of K 303 14:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Much of the information in the introductory paragraph is repeated again in the main section and I would propose that the introduction should be shortened. It would make the text read better because it would be less repetitious.
One man's freedom fighter ( talk) 15:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Iñaki de Juana Chaos/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Article might get volatile now that subject is back in the news; however, several substantial and well-cited subsections make this article B-class currently. - Fsotrain 09 02:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 02:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 19:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)