This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hyphanet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
external links may need to be updated. news about the current development, as well.
Just some random feedback here. I hope this is the right spot...
I was reading the article and the major heading 'Technical design' mentions 'darknet' and 'opennet' several times. These are not concepts that I, a random article reader, understood. I was pleased to discover a discussion of these concepts in a subsequent major heading, but had to reread 'Technical design.' This makes is fairly clear to me that the 'Darknet versus Opennet' heading should be above 'Technical design,' so rereading is not required. I didn't want to change it right away, but if someone doesn't tell me otherwise, I plan on changing things around within a few weeks.
Meson537 ( talk) 01:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Is there any evidence that Freenet actually -is- being used for child porn? I admit, reading the faqs page, as noted in the criticism dicussions below, basically says that if you use freenet, your computer will have child porn on it, regardless of whether you want it to or not. Which is rather disturbing, but...I have a hard time believing that could actually be the case, because I'm a naive idealist, but I'm -certainly- not willing to download the program to find out. Regardless of its potentials...what bad things is this program being used for right now? And why is that just on the talk page and not in the actual article? Hewhorulestheworld ( talk) 19:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
You do not understand the nature of freenet. If there was childporn, there is childporn, and will always be chilporn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.205.127.229 ( talk) 16:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I just checked it out and there are still a few OK cp sites on there, but most don't work too well. I think most pedos now use Frost or something, but I can't get that to work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.171.175.30 ( talk) 09:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I just went on freenet in the light of the wikileaks-US stuff going on. After five minutes I noticed a lot of posts referring to 'darker material', '<11', 'explicit stuff, not picky', etc. WTF people?! Sick. AbHowitzer ( talk) 13:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I'd love to see a section that provides a critical discussion of freenet: a summary of both strengths and weaknesses. What is it best at? what is it worst at? What uses are are recommended? what uses would it not be suitable for? What answers to the above questions are expected to change over time? Basically, why would an interested newbie invest the time to install & use this, in plain, practical terms (as opposed to technical/political terms)? 67.52.129.61 ( talk) 01:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
And no mention that Freenet 0.5 still exists and is much more anonymous than 0.7; there was mention, but it seems to have been killed. Paganize ( talk) 10:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
I know that Freenet is free software, but does it require any non-free software?
It requires Java. Do the free Java implementations suffice? Gronky ( talk) 05:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
If someone could expand on the history of the Freenet 0.5 to Freenet 0.7 fork and differences in communities, that would be appreciated. johndoe32102002 ( talk) 23:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Link leads to CppFCPLib. It is C++ and not C libraries, as described. For now i have found just this link for FCPLib http://freenet.googlecode.com/svn/branches/legacy/apps/fcptools/ezFCPlib/ . 213.87.240.158 ( talk) 06:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The contents of the Freesite page were merged into Hyphanet. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freenet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Freenet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://github.com/freenet/lib-CppFCPLib-officialWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hiii 2409:4060:2E9C:9404:0:0:6009:4803 ( talk) 15:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
I used Freenet many years ago and just remembered it today. It seems like the Freenet project has a new project, which I assume is to replace the existing one. The new project was called Locutus, but has been renamed to Freenet. And the original Freenet has been renamed to Hyphanet. This is probably worth adding to the page, or even renaming the page and creating a new one for either the old or the new project. But I don't know what the best thing to do would be. If nobody does anything after a few weeks I might look into doing something about it. Capturts ( talk) 03:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hyphanet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
external links may need to be updated. news about the current development, as well.
Just some random feedback here. I hope this is the right spot...
I was reading the article and the major heading 'Technical design' mentions 'darknet' and 'opennet' several times. These are not concepts that I, a random article reader, understood. I was pleased to discover a discussion of these concepts in a subsequent major heading, but had to reread 'Technical design.' This makes is fairly clear to me that the 'Darknet versus Opennet' heading should be above 'Technical design,' so rereading is not required. I didn't want to change it right away, but if someone doesn't tell me otherwise, I plan on changing things around within a few weeks.
Meson537 ( talk) 01:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Is there any evidence that Freenet actually -is- being used for child porn? I admit, reading the faqs page, as noted in the criticism dicussions below, basically says that if you use freenet, your computer will have child porn on it, regardless of whether you want it to or not. Which is rather disturbing, but...I have a hard time believing that could actually be the case, because I'm a naive idealist, but I'm -certainly- not willing to download the program to find out. Regardless of its potentials...what bad things is this program being used for right now? And why is that just on the talk page and not in the actual article? Hewhorulestheworld ( talk) 19:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
You do not understand the nature of freenet. If there was childporn, there is childporn, and will always be chilporn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.205.127.229 ( talk) 16:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I just checked it out and there are still a few OK cp sites on there, but most don't work too well. I think most pedos now use Frost or something, but I can't get that to work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.171.175.30 ( talk) 09:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I just went on freenet in the light of the wikileaks-US stuff going on. After five minutes I noticed a lot of posts referring to 'darker material', '<11', 'explicit stuff, not picky', etc. WTF people?! Sick. AbHowitzer ( talk) 13:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I'd love to see a section that provides a critical discussion of freenet: a summary of both strengths and weaknesses. What is it best at? what is it worst at? What uses are are recommended? what uses would it not be suitable for? What answers to the above questions are expected to change over time? Basically, why would an interested newbie invest the time to install & use this, in plain, practical terms (as opposed to technical/political terms)? 67.52.129.61 ( talk) 01:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
And no mention that Freenet 0.5 still exists and is much more anonymous than 0.7; there was mention, but it seems to have been killed. Paganize ( talk) 10:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
I know that Freenet is free software, but does it require any non-free software?
It requires Java. Do the free Java implementations suffice? Gronky ( talk) 05:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
If someone could expand on the history of the Freenet 0.5 to Freenet 0.7 fork and differences in communities, that would be appreciated. johndoe32102002 ( talk) 23:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Link leads to CppFCPLib. It is C++ and not C libraries, as described. For now i have found just this link for FCPLib http://freenet.googlecode.com/svn/branches/legacy/apps/fcptools/ezFCPlib/ . 213.87.240.158 ( talk) 06:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The contents of the Freesite page were merged into Hyphanet. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freenet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Freenet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://github.com/freenet/lib-CppFCPLib-officialWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hiii 2409:4060:2E9C:9404:0:0:6009:4803 ( talk) 15:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
I used Freenet many years ago and just remembered it today. It seems like the Freenet project has a new project, which I assume is to replace the existing one. The new project was called Locutus, but has been renamed to Freenet. And the original Freenet has been renamed to Hyphanet. This is probably worth adding to the page, or even renaming the page and creating a new one for either the old or the new project. But I don't know what the best thing to do would be. If nobody does anything after a few weeks I might look into doing something about it. Capturts ( talk) 03:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)