The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have done a check of certain items of the GA criteria, outstanding issues are in bold. I should have my spot check and prose review complete within 48 hours.
GMH Melbourne (
talk)
05:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry for the delay. I have completed the and spot-check, started the prose review feel free to push back if you disagree with any of my comments. I should have it all completed ASAP.
GMH Melbourne (
talk)
04:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Fritzmann, I have finished the review. I ticked off the image section of the GA criteria, finished the prose review, and have left some comments below for you to action. I have also left additional comments for the reference section.
GMH Melbourne (
talk)
12:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)reply
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Lede section
Y Wikilink "perennial herb" and "Hypericum".
Etymology section
Y write the Turkish translation, özge kantaron, with {{Lang}}.
Y Unbolden "özge kantaron"
Description section
Y attacked → attached
Y "wide oval," remove comma
Y on the leaf → of the leaf
Y "oblong," remove comma
YThe sepals are around 0.25 cm long and 1.5 cm wide, will all be the same size on each flower, and overlap one another. rewrite for easier reading. Perhaps: "The sepals are approximately 0.25 cm long and 1.5 cm wide. They are all the same size on each flower and overlap each other."
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
Y There are a few names of authors, publishers, websites, etc. that aren't wikilinked where an article exists (eg. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, JSTOR, Robson, Norman (in the bibliography section)). I am not sure if it's required but it would make the reference section consistent.
Y There are a few more names in the reference section that could be wikilinked. Also write out the full name of WCMC (and wikilink).
I've linked all publishers and journals with articles and think that should be sufficient. This isn't one of the GA criteria to my knowledge
Y Wrap the bibliography section within the {{refbegin}} and {{refend}} templates.
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Spot check complete, no signs of original research, all information is citing with reliable sources and there aren't any copyright violations.
YPer
MOS:ALT and for accessibility, the image in the infobox should have the image_alt parameter and perhaps (but not required) the image_caption parameter.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have done a check of certain items of the GA criteria, outstanding issues are in bold. I should have my spot check and prose review complete within 48 hours.
GMH Melbourne (
talk)
05:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry for the delay. I have completed the and spot-check, started the prose review feel free to push back if you disagree with any of my comments. I should have it all completed ASAP.
GMH Melbourne (
talk)
04:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Fritzmann, I have finished the review. I ticked off the image section of the GA criteria, finished the prose review, and have left some comments below for you to action. I have also left additional comments for the reference section.
GMH Melbourne (
talk)
12:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)reply
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Lede section
Y Wikilink "perennial herb" and "Hypericum".
Etymology section
Y write the Turkish translation, özge kantaron, with {{Lang}}.
Y Unbolden "özge kantaron"
Description section
Y attacked → attached
Y "wide oval," remove comma
Y on the leaf → of the leaf
Y "oblong," remove comma
YThe sepals are around 0.25 cm long and 1.5 cm wide, will all be the same size on each flower, and overlap one another. rewrite for easier reading. Perhaps: "The sepals are approximately 0.25 cm long and 1.5 cm wide. They are all the same size on each flower and overlap each other."
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
Y There are a few names of authors, publishers, websites, etc. that aren't wikilinked where an article exists (eg. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, JSTOR, Robson, Norman (in the bibliography section)). I am not sure if it's required but it would make the reference section consistent.
Y There are a few more names in the reference section that could be wikilinked. Also write out the full name of WCMC (and wikilink).
I've linked all publishers and journals with articles and think that should be sufficient. This isn't one of the GA criteria to my knowledge
Y Wrap the bibliography section within the {{refbegin}} and {{refend}} templates.
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Spot check complete, no signs of original research, all information is citing with reliable sources and there aren't any copyright violations.
YPer
MOS:ALT and for accessibility, the image in the infobox should have the image_alt parameter and perhaps (but not required) the image_caption parameter.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.