This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gave wikipedia a stand alone hydrogen bomb page, feel free to add pictures or other things to the article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by anonymous ( talk • contribs)
This is also the name of a level in "Duke Nukem:Zero Hour ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deuxhero ( talk • contribs)
The article appeares to be coied from The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2006. In any case, the article is a duplicate so a redirect is appropriate. -- Whpq 17:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
whatever the "Teller–Ulam" design?? is, it certainly is not a hydrogen bomb. hydrogen bomb is a fission driven device. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.192.235.118 (
talk)
22:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0824719.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:00, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
If Thermonuclear bomb redirects, so should this one. NPguy ( talk) 21:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm not interested in any content. The question: should Wikipedia has an article on "hydrogen bomb", which would cover not only " thermonuclear weapon" aspect of it but also historical/political aspect. To me this answer is yes. What I have in mind is a much expanded version of the "Hydrogen bombs" section in Nuclear weapon design. -- Taku ( talk) 12:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gave wikipedia a stand alone hydrogen bomb page, feel free to add pictures or other things to the article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by anonymous ( talk • contribs)
This is also the name of a level in "Duke Nukem:Zero Hour ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deuxhero ( talk • contribs)
The article appeares to be coied from The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2006. In any case, the article is a duplicate so a redirect is appropriate. -- Whpq 17:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
whatever the "Teller–Ulam" design?? is, it certainly is not a hydrogen bomb. hydrogen bomb is a fission driven device. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.192.235.118 (
talk)
22:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0824719.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:00, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
If Thermonuclear bomb redirects, so should this one. NPguy ( talk) 21:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm not interested in any content. The question: should Wikipedia has an article on "hydrogen bomb", which would cover not only " thermonuclear weapon" aspect of it but also historical/political aspect. To me this answer is yes. What I have in mind is a much expanded version of the "Hydrogen bombs" section in Nuclear weapon design. -- Taku ( talk) 12:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)