![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Orcahasenteredthechat. Peer reviewers:
Eternalsabre,
Renee. Beaumont.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Iris Paige. Peer reviewers:
Overbrewed.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Most vampires in fiction are "Werevampires" (linguistic issues aside). Bunnicula is a rare exception.
Editors here may be interested in this ongoing discussion. -- B. Wolterding ( talk) 21:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
In para 6 and 7, does the author mean "motif" rather than "motive"? Motif is a recurring salient thematic element in a work of art, which is what is being described. Virgil H. Soule ( talk) 13:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Under the Egyptian category, it mentions a "cobra-headed Amunet," but when you go to the article about her, there's no mention of a snake head of any sort, and the picture of a depiction of her appears to show a human head. The only snake-like thing in the entire article is what appears to be a cobra in one of the example hieroglyphs.
I don't know if this is a false claim, a poorly summarized one, or an accurate one whose subject is somehow completely omitted in the subject article.
Thanks! 68.65.37.10 ( talk) 17:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. This discussion attracted little attention and less agreement, and the relist doesn't seem to have helped. Consequently, a consensus has not emerged for or against any action. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Hybrid beasts in folklore → Mythological hybrid – No justification for change in scope, or precedent for using the term "beasts". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 07:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). – robertsky ( talk) 12:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky ( talk) 14:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Orcahasenteredthechat. Peer reviewers:
Eternalsabre,
Renee. Beaumont.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Iris Paige. Peer reviewers:
Overbrewed.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Most vampires in fiction are "Werevampires" (linguistic issues aside). Bunnicula is a rare exception.
Editors here may be interested in this ongoing discussion. -- B. Wolterding ( talk) 21:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
In para 6 and 7, does the author mean "motif" rather than "motive"? Motif is a recurring salient thematic element in a work of art, which is what is being described. Virgil H. Soule ( talk) 13:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Under the Egyptian category, it mentions a "cobra-headed Amunet," but when you go to the article about her, there's no mention of a snake head of any sort, and the picture of a depiction of her appears to show a human head. The only snake-like thing in the entire article is what appears to be a cobra in one of the example hieroglyphs.
I don't know if this is a false claim, a poorly summarized one, or an accurate one whose subject is somehow completely omitted in the subject article.
Thanks! 68.65.37.10 ( talk) 17:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. This discussion attracted little attention and less agreement, and the relist doesn't seem to have helped. Consequently, a consensus has not emerged for or against any action. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Hybrid beasts in folklore → Mythological hybrid – No justification for change in scope, or precedent for using the term "beasts". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 07:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request ( permalink). – robertsky ( talk) 12:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky ( talk) 14:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)