This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the
Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to
Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nicole is not yet a tropical storm but why the draft’s title is ‘’Tropical Storm Nicole (2022)?’’
115.96.152.73 (
talk) 09:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
It soon will become a tropical storm and we can move the article
Rainbow Galaxy POC (
talk) 13:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Done and now the storm is now Tropical Storm NicoleRainbow Galaxy POC (
talk) 15:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hurri. Nicole has also done great financial damage to Florida
It has been removed because it was unsourced. It can be reverted back if there is a reliable source provided.
Sarrail (
talk) 15:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Definitely too soon to include any speculative damage estimates or make any broad dire statements in the article.
Drdpw (
talk) 15:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Other states
Are the other states affected by Nicole just going under "Elsewhere" or what?
Mitch199811 (
talk) 17:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
section headers now read 'Other states'.
Drdpw (
talk) 17:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes, unless Nicole has significant impacts on a specific state.
Sarrail (
talk) 17:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Fixed some things
Nicole has dissipated on November 12. 2022
35.136.106.82 (
talk) 22:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Accuweather
AccuWeather states damage from Nicole was 8-12 billion. Idk if that is accurate though, but IMO, it could be possible.
Hurricane Su (
talk) 02:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hurricane Su Accuweather is an unreliable source for the most part they are the same people that thought
Hurricane Henri caused $8-12 Billion in damages but in reality, it caused $700 million. They also did the same thing with
Hurricane Ian they thought Ian caused $190 Billion, but in reality it caused around $50-70 Billion. They like overblowing things to get more clicks on their website. So we should wait on Aon or NOAA or some other reliable source to release their numbers for Nicole.
Cyclonetracker7586 (
talk) 05:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Did Nicole do anything significant to Canada to get a section?
Mitch199811 (
talk) 02:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Where? I don't see anything that involves Canada, besides a source.
Sarrail(talk) 02:28, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
It rained in southern Quebec and Maritime Canada. There were gusty winds and isolated power outages. Nothing significant going by the CTV and CBC coverage.
Drdpw (
talk) 03:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
No section needed based on the minor damage it caused.
Sarrail(talk) 03:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Nicole was absorbed by the cold front and it was a separate low that crossed the Atlantic. And FYI, forecasts are not facts they are predictions.
Drdpw (
talk) 13:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes this forecasted rainfall is not directly associated with Nicole
Hurricane Chandler (
talk) 01:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Images of Damages in Florida
Hey guys, I just uploaded some pictures of damages on commons of damages from Nicole in Volusia county a few weeks after the fact.
✶Mitch199811✶ [
Talk] 22:51, 18 December 2022 (UTC)reply
RfC for the best image of Hurricane Nicole
The following discussion is an archived record of a
request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Option 2 — Out of the three options, which are all Hurricane Nicole just before landfall in Florida, option 2 provides the most context and honestly the best visually appealing satellite imagery of Hurricane Nicole. Option 1 was taken at 06:20 UTC, Option 2 was taken at 06:57 UTC, and Option 3 was taken at 07:10 UTC. Both option 1 and three appear to have been taken with the satellite farther south than when option 2 was taken, as option 2 appears to be more “directly looking down” at Hurricane Nicole, rather than a little bit down and horizontal to Hurricane Nicole. So Option 2 is my choice as it is the most visually appealing image to the reader.
Elijahandskip (
talk) 16:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option 1 Option 3 is transparent and is undesirable. As for option 2, per
WP:WPTC/IMG says that the most iconic image of the storm should be used, which I argue it is. Option 2 is in gray scale (which is the 6th choice for
WP:WPTC/IMG) and colored images are preferred. Also, there is nothing about needing the image to be centered (eg.
Hurricane Irene).
RandomInfinity17 (
talk -
contributions) 18:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Just a question. When you say option one is the most iconic, is there
RS sources that use it, or how are you determining it is the most iconic? Also, if it is the "most iconic", why didn't the
National Hurricane Center use it anywhere in their
tropical cyclone report on Hurricane Nicole?
Elijahandskip (
talk) 18:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I guess I was just saying the colored images seem to be preferred over grayscale images.
RandomInfinity17 (
talk -
contributions) 19:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option 1. In addition to what is stated above, #1 provides us with sharper cloud details, which gives viewers a better sense of the storm's structure, and is free from the distractions of city lighting and superimposed coastlines and state lines. My !vote is also informed by
this (now archived) discussion on the 2022 AHS talk page.
Drdpw (
talk) 20:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option 1 All three of them have issues. While I do think 2 looks nice, it is in grey scale. Option 3 is close to the current one except the clouds are extra transparent. While option 1 is blurry and off-centered.
I am choosing option 1 as it is the current image and has no show stopping flaws. Though, I feel like we need a higher quality image of 1 or something close in time.
✶Mitch199811✶ 11:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option #1 (Current Image) Per
WPTC/IMG, visible images are preferred over infrared images, so Option #3 would be eliminated since it is an infrared image of Nicole. Infrared images should be used in a last resort type situation, say if there was no full moon or gibbous moon that would illuminate the storm at night. VIIRS satellites would not be able to pick up any visible light from the storm, which at the time Nicole was active, was a waning gibbous moon. That is why we have Options #1 and #2. Now the problem with Option #2 is that it is a grayscale image. Colored images have precedence over grayscale images though Option #2 is also a visible image. Also, another problem with Option #2 is that the state borders are somewhat distracting.
Furthermore, I mentioned in the 2022 Atlantic hurricane seasons' talk page back in November
here not all tropical cyclone images have to be centered the polar orbiting satellites don't pass over tropical cyclones all the time there are a few tropical cyclone images on Wikipedia we are using that is off-centered. Even Option #2 isn't centered over Nicole's eye. The only one that is centered is Option #3, which doesn't look visually appealing, so Option #1 is best to use, but this is only my opinion.
Cyclonetracker7586 (
talk) 14:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option #1 (Current Image) for the reasons already said by others supporting this option.
Fad Ariff (
talk) 12:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option #1 (Current Image)According to
WPTC/IMGthe color image Option #1 and Option #3 are preferred over Option #2.Option #3 is the infrared image of Nicole, according to
WPTC/IMG Option #1 is the best option.--
Lqy328 (
talk) 06:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the
Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to
Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nicole is not yet a tropical storm but why the draft’s title is ‘’Tropical Storm Nicole (2022)?’’
115.96.152.73 (
talk) 09:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
It soon will become a tropical storm and we can move the article
Rainbow Galaxy POC (
talk) 13:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Done and now the storm is now Tropical Storm NicoleRainbow Galaxy POC (
talk) 15:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hurri. Nicole has also done great financial damage to Florida
It has been removed because it was unsourced. It can be reverted back if there is a reliable source provided.
Sarrail (
talk) 15:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Definitely too soon to include any speculative damage estimates or make any broad dire statements in the article.
Drdpw (
talk) 15:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Other states
Are the other states affected by Nicole just going under "Elsewhere" or what?
Mitch199811 (
talk) 17:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
section headers now read 'Other states'.
Drdpw (
talk) 17:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes, unless Nicole has significant impacts on a specific state.
Sarrail (
talk) 17:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Fixed some things
Nicole has dissipated on November 12. 2022
35.136.106.82 (
talk) 22:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Accuweather
AccuWeather states damage from Nicole was 8-12 billion. Idk if that is accurate though, but IMO, it could be possible.
Hurricane Su (
talk) 02:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hurricane Su Accuweather is an unreliable source for the most part they are the same people that thought
Hurricane Henri caused $8-12 Billion in damages but in reality, it caused $700 million. They also did the same thing with
Hurricane Ian they thought Ian caused $190 Billion, but in reality it caused around $50-70 Billion. They like overblowing things to get more clicks on their website. So we should wait on Aon or NOAA or some other reliable source to release their numbers for Nicole.
Cyclonetracker7586 (
talk) 05:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Did Nicole do anything significant to Canada to get a section?
Mitch199811 (
talk) 02:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Where? I don't see anything that involves Canada, besides a source.
Sarrail(talk) 02:28, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
It rained in southern Quebec and Maritime Canada. There were gusty winds and isolated power outages. Nothing significant going by the CTV and CBC coverage.
Drdpw (
talk) 03:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
No section needed based on the minor damage it caused.
Sarrail(talk) 03:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Nicole was absorbed by the cold front and it was a separate low that crossed the Atlantic. And FYI, forecasts are not facts they are predictions.
Drdpw (
talk) 13:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes this forecasted rainfall is not directly associated with Nicole
Hurricane Chandler (
talk) 01:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Images of Damages in Florida
Hey guys, I just uploaded some pictures of damages on commons of damages from Nicole in Volusia county a few weeks after the fact.
✶Mitch199811✶ [
Talk] 22:51, 18 December 2022 (UTC)reply
RfC for the best image of Hurricane Nicole
The following discussion is an archived record of a
request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Option 2 — Out of the three options, which are all Hurricane Nicole just before landfall in Florida, option 2 provides the most context and honestly the best visually appealing satellite imagery of Hurricane Nicole. Option 1 was taken at 06:20 UTC, Option 2 was taken at 06:57 UTC, and Option 3 was taken at 07:10 UTC. Both option 1 and three appear to have been taken with the satellite farther south than when option 2 was taken, as option 2 appears to be more “directly looking down” at Hurricane Nicole, rather than a little bit down and horizontal to Hurricane Nicole. So Option 2 is my choice as it is the most visually appealing image to the reader.
Elijahandskip (
talk) 16:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option 1 Option 3 is transparent and is undesirable. As for option 2, per
WP:WPTC/IMG says that the most iconic image of the storm should be used, which I argue it is. Option 2 is in gray scale (which is the 6th choice for
WP:WPTC/IMG) and colored images are preferred. Also, there is nothing about needing the image to be centered (eg.
Hurricane Irene).
RandomInfinity17 (
talk -
contributions) 18:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Just a question. When you say option one is the most iconic, is there
RS sources that use it, or how are you determining it is the most iconic? Also, if it is the "most iconic", why didn't the
National Hurricane Center use it anywhere in their
tropical cyclone report on Hurricane Nicole?
Elijahandskip (
talk) 18:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I guess I was just saying the colored images seem to be preferred over grayscale images.
RandomInfinity17 (
talk -
contributions) 19:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option 1. In addition to what is stated above, #1 provides us with sharper cloud details, which gives viewers a better sense of the storm's structure, and is free from the distractions of city lighting and superimposed coastlines and state lines. My !vote is also informed by
this (now archived) discussion on the 2022 AHS talk page.
Drdpw (
talk) 20:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option 1 All three of them have issues. While I do think 2 looks nice, it is in grey scale. Option 3 is close to the current one except the clouds are extra transparent. While option 1 is blurry and off-centered.
I am choosing option 1 as it is the current image and has no show stopping flaws. Though, I feel like we need a higher quality image of 1 or something close in time.
✶Mitch199811✶ 11:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option #1 (Current Image) Per
WPTC/IMG, visible images are preferred over infrared images, so Option #3 would be eliminated since it is an infrared image of Nicole. Infrared images should be used in a last resort type situation, say if there was no full moon or gibbous moon that would illuminate the storm at night. VIIRS satellites would not be able to pick up any visible light from the storm, which at the time Nicole was active, was a waning gibbous moon. That is why we have Options #1 and #2. Now the problem with Option #2 is that it is a grayscale image. Colored images have precedence over grayscale images though Option #2 is also a visible image. Also, another problem with Option #2 is that the state borders are somewhat distracting.
Furthermore, I mentioned in the 2022 Atlantic hurricane seasons' talk page back in November
here not all tropical cyclone images have to be centered the polar orbiting satellites don't pass over tropical cyclones all the time there are a few tropical cyclone images on Wikipedia we are using that is off-centered. Even Option #2 isn't centered over Nicole's eye. The only one that is centered is Option #3, which doesn't look visually appealing, so Option #1 is best to use, but this is only my opinion.
Cyclonetracker7586 (
talk) 14:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option #1 (Current Image) for the reasons already said by others supporting this option.
Fad Ariff (
talk) 12:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Option #1 (Current Image)According to
WPTC/IMGthe color image Option #1 and Option #3 are preferred over Option #2.Option #3 is the infrared image of Nicole, according to
WPTC/IMG Option #1 is the best option.--
Lqy328 (
talk) 06:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.