This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of April 4, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: No. Strings of disconnected sentences, short sentences, lack of flow, overuse of vernacular English.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Yes. Accurate, there was nothing I could find that was untrue.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes. Generally although the sections outside the plot synopsis are not large enough
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Yes.
- 5. Article stability? Yes
- 6. Images?: Yes Very good suitable images
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. —
The content is there, although it needs a rewrite before it can be accepted as a good article. I've started with the first paragraph of the plot summary JameiLei 20:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of April 4, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: No. Strings of disconnected sentences, short sentences, lack of flow, overuse of vernacular English.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Yes. Accurate, there was nothing I could find that was untrue.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes. Generally although the sections outside the plot synopsis are not large enough
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Yes.
- 5. Article stability? Yes
- 6. Images?: Yes Very good suitable images
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. —
The content is there, although it needs a rewrite before it can be accepted as a good article. I've started with the first paragraph of the plot summary JameiLei 20:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)