![]() | Hurricane Maria (2005) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'd just like to point out that that long quote comes from Pentacle Magazine - "The UK's Leading Independent Pagan Magazine". Jdorje 05:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Why does the article title include the year? There is no need for it because it was the first time the name had been used.-- Cool Genius 23:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
I think that this article should be merged, not every single storm needs an article. This storm didn't do a thing while it was a tropical storm. -- 24.83.100.214 03:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Help_Desk#Image_will_not_display.3F. Apparently the image will not be resized automatically because it is too large. Jdorje 02:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Needs pictures (something from Norway or Iceland?) and references. Jdorje 20:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Link to a picture of one of the mudslides... CrazyC83 03:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, there needs to be a picture of a landslide from Maria, but can we use this one? Please respond. Lionheart Omega 20:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
The uploaded track map doesn't show it but the best-track does not take Maria all the way to Norway. So can the destruction in Norway be attributed even to Maria's remnants? — jdorje ( talk) 04:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
" On September 18, a woman died of injuries. Her daughter died on February 7, 2006, after having been kept alive in a respirator since the accident." Wouldn't this count for it? HurricaneCraze32 20:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :
Additional comments :
Just answer the few request/comments made above and it will be done for the GA candidacy. Good luck on improving. Lincher 02:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Lincher 02:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
The minor adjustments done by CrazyC83 really enhance the readability of the aforementioned sections and helps in bringing the article to the GA status by passing criterion 1. Lincher 03:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 22:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Hurricane Maria (2005). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Maria (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
OK hear me out. Maria as a hurricane wasn't particularly interesting, and honestly the current article barely does enough to justify its existence. The true cause of notability was the floods and landslides in Norway, which currently exists as Hatlestad Slide. The reason I bring it up is that there were impacts outside of Hatlestad. I think everything can be covered in one article, so perhaps move it to Cyclone Kristen, which was the extratropical cyclone that was the merger of Maria and Nate, or perhaps just call it the 2005 Norway floods, and cover the Maria portion in the met history. As it stands, much of Maria's tropical meteorological history can/should be merged into the season article, since that is currently unsourced. This 2021 flood report referred to Kristen, as well as Maria/Nate. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Hurricane Maria (2005) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'd just like to point out that that long quote comes from Pentacle Magazine - "The UK's Leading Independent Pagan Magazine". Jdorje 05:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Why does the article title include the year? There is no need for it because it was the first time the name had been used.-- Cool Genius 23:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
I think that this article should be merged, not every single storm needs an article. This storm didn't do a thing while it was a tropical storm. -- 24.83.100.214 03:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Help_Desk#Image_will_not_display.3F. Apparently the image will not be resized automatically because it is too large. Jdorje 02:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Needs pictures (something from Norway or Iceland?) and references. Jdorje 20:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Link to a picture of one of the mudslides... CrazyC83 03:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, there needs to be a picture of a landslide from Maria, but can we use this one? Please respond. Lionheart Omega 20:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
The uploaded track map doesn't show it but the best-track does not take Maria all the way to Norway. So can the destruction in Norway be attributed even to Maria's remnants? — jdorje ( talk) 04:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
" On September 18, a woman died of injuries. Her daughter died on February 7, 2006, after having been kept alive in a respirator since the accident." Wouldn't this count for it? HurricaneCraze32 20:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :
Additional comments :
Just answer the few request/comments made above and it will be done for the GA candidacy. Good luck on improving. Lincher 02:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Lincher 02:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
The minor adjustments done by CrazyC83 really enhance the readability of the aforementioned sections and helps in bringing the article to the GA status by passing criterion 1. Lincher 03:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 22:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Hurricane Maria (2005). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Maria (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
OK hear me out. Maria as a hurricane wasn't particularly interesting, and honestly the current article barely does enough to justify its existence. The true cause of notability was the floods and landslides in Norway, which currently exists as Hatlestad Slide. The reason I bring it up is that there were impacts outside of Hatlestad. I think everything can be covered in one article, so perhaps move it to Cyclone Kristen, which was the extratropical cyclone that was the merger of Maria and Nate, or perhaps just call it the 2005 Norway floods, and cover the Maria portion in the met history. As it stands, much of Maria's tropical meteorological history can/should be merged into the season article, since that is currently unsourced. This 2021 flood report referred to Kristen, as well as Maria/Nate. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)