Hurricane Kenna is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hurricane Kenna is part of the Retired Pacific hurricanes series, a good topic. It is also part of the Category 5 Pacific hurricanes series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 28, 2007. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More impact. Jdorje 20:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I recently reviewed this article and I really feel that it is not ready to be a Good Article. After comparing this article to Hurricane Andrew (which is a Good Article), I rated it in the following way:
Well written: Failed, see below
Factually accurate and verifiable: Passed, many good references.
Broad in its coverage: Passed, includes all necessary information
Has Neutral Point of View: Passed, seems to be NPOV, statements about its destructive power and notability are stated objectively.
Stable: Passed, not frequently edited
Pictures: Passed, five meaningful pictures
I feel this article is poorly written. There are a few instances needing copyediting for grammar. Several confusing phrases appear (the first paragraph includes the phrases "strengthen lesser" and "favorable upper-level conditions" which made me scratch my head). The "Storm history" section is repetitive ("shortly after" is used far too many times). And overall, it just doesn't seem to flow well. This article does seem very promising (and I think that next time around it will be one), but I feel that this article needs more time and rewriting before it can be considered a Good Article. Thunderforge 21:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I made a few needed copyedits, and it's now suitable IMHO to be passed as a Good Article. So have you wished it, so shall it be... - Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 16:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
why are all these hurricane articles so poorly written? Did someone just copy/paste this their term paper?
"There, sustained winds reached an estimated 06 mph (170 km/h).[" 68.38.197.76 ( talk) 02:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Hurricane Kenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Kenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Kenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Listing at WP:FARGIVEN. CCI check not done. Noah Talk 23:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Hurricane Kenna is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hurricane Kenna is part of the Retired Pacific hurricanes series, a good topic. It is also part of the Category 5 Pacific hurricanes series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 28, 2007. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More impact. Jdorje 20:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I recently reviewed this article and I really feel that it is not ready to be a Good Article. After comparing this article to Hurricane Andrew (which is a Good Article), I rated it in the following way:
Well written: Failed, see below
Factually accurate and verifiable: Passed, many good references.
Broad in its coverage: Passed, includes all necessary information
Has Neutral Point of View: Passed, seems to be NPOV, statements about its destructive power and notability are stated objectively.
Stable: Passed, not frequently edited
Pictures: Passed, five meaningful pictures
I feel this article is poorly written. There are a few instances needing copyediting for grammar. Several confusing phrases appear (the first paragraph includes the phrases "strengthen lesser" and "favorable upper-level conditions" which made me scratch my head). The "Storm history" section is repetitive ("shortly after" is used far too many times). And overall, it just doesn't seem to flow well. This article does seem very promising (and I think that next time around it will be one), but I feel that this article needs more time and rewriting before it can be considered a Good Article. Thunderforge 21:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I made a few needed copyedits, and it's now suitable IMHO to be passed as a Good Article. So have you wished it, so shall it be... - Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 16:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
why are all these hurricane articles so poorly written? Did someone just copy/paste this their term paper?
"There, sustained winds reached an estimated 06 mph (170 km/h).[" 68.38.197.76 ( talk) 02:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Hurricane Kenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Kenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Kenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Listing at WP:FARGIVEN. CCI check not done. Noah Talk 23:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)