GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sven Manguard ( talk · contribs) 06:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I will be performing a review of this nomination within the next 48 hours. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
GAN Quicksheet 1.24 SM
(
Criteria)
Starting comments:
1. Well written:
2. Accurate and verifiable: Section acceptable
3. Broad in coverage: Section acceptable
4. Neutral: Section acceptable
6. Image use: Section acceptable
7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:
Comments after the initial review: To be blunt, you need to spend more time copyediting. I'm used to fixing articles up as I go during reviews, but you've left a lot more work for me to do in that regard than I can ever remember having to do for an article that I considered likely to pass. I'm sorry, but it just feels rushed, and the Wikicup isn't license to rush through prose. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sven Manguard ( talk · contribs) 06:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I will be performing a review of this nomination within the next 48 hours. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
GAN Quicksheet 1.24 SM
(
Criteria)
Starting comments:
1. Well written:
2. Accurate and verifiable: Section acceptable
3. Broad in coverage: Section acceptable
4. Neutral: Section acceptable
6. Image use: Section acceptable
7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:
Comments after the initial review: To be blunt, you need to spend more time copyediting. I'm used to fixing articles up as I go during reviews, but you've left a lot more work for me to do in that regard than I can ever remember having to do for an article that I considered likely to pass. I'm sorry, but it just feels rushed, and the Wikicup isn't license to rush through prose. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC)