![]() | Hurricane Hilda (1955) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Hurricane Hilda (1955) is part of the 1955 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs more impact. Jdorje 04:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
There needs to be something about why Hilda was not retired. As I understand it as a decided non-expert, a storm causing this much damage should be almost a dead cert for retirement. If there's stuff available about why it wasn't retired, that really needs to be in the article. Loganberry ( Talk) 22:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
The current revision of the article credits Hilda as a Category 5 hurricane. Where the heck did that come from? --Dylan620 ( Home • yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 00:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 15:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Hilda (1955). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Hurricane Hilda (1955) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Hurricane Hilda (1955) is part of the 1955 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs more impact. Jdorje 04:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
There needs to be something about why Hilda was not retired. As I understand it as a decided non-expert, a storm causing this much damage should be almost a dead cert for retirement. If there's stuff available about why it wasn't retired, that really needs to be in the article. Loganberry ( Talk) 22:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
The current revision of the article credits Hilda as a Category 5 hurricane. Where the heck did that come from? --Dylan620 ( Home • yadda yadda yadda • Ooooohh!) 00:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 15:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Hilda (1955). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)