This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hurricane Hilary article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 14 days
![]() |
![]() | Hurricane Hilary has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 21, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is a current
featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to
meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{ Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() |
|
![]() | On 20 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Hurricane Hilary (2023) to Hurricane Hilary. The result of the discussion was moved. |
![]() | This
edit request to
Hurricane Hilary (2023) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add under the impact section that 6.00 in (152 mm) of rain fell in Bristlecone, setting a preliminary state record. Source:
https://x.com/nwswpc/status/1693460051946807403?s=46&t=w8Gp3NcH6th9VzdY5gs4Pw (I know it’s a tweet but it’s directly from the WPC)
2610:130:109:12:6DCE:2418:948B:2085 (
talk)
21:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm sorry for all the trouble. Also, deleting the source was an accident and I was trying to get it back for you. I'll just stay out of this discussion. Thanks. LoveHop123 ( talk) 00:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Drdpw: If an earthquake is brought up on an article about a hurricane, I think it's important to unambiguously explain that it's just a coincidence, and why it is. I can't really imagine a situation where it's worth mentioning an earthquake happened at the same time, but *not* worth mentioning that they're unrelated. I've personally seen several people guessing they were related, so a debunk doesn't seem frivolous to me, personally. Of course it's obvious to us that it's not related, but I think it's not fair to assume everyone reading the page will implicitly know that already. exoplanetaryscience ( talk) 04:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
How much damages did the storm do? [2] The headline of FOX5 says that there was minimal damage but then later says it was just normal (and it also might only be tallying Baja California's and San Diego's damages). While looking up "Hurricane Hilary damages" brings up article after article describing catastrophic damages. ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 15:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
This storm made it to British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan, shouldn't it merit some mention? -- 64.16.13.2 ( talk) 20:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
We really got to put one in soon. It’s off the noaa billions list, and Aon likely doesn’t have an update until January at earliest. We have the $600m estimate - should we put that in? 70.23.39.2 ( talk) 22:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Hurricanehink ( talk · contribs) 04:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Dylan620 ( talk · contribs) 22:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
I have this article watchlisted and have been noticing the nominator's work on it; looking forward to reviewing, which I should be able to begin within the next few days. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
In Mexico, the hurricane...)
The origins of Hilary was– either 'origin' or 'were'
By the time of its peak, Hilary commenced a 48 hour period of intensification following its development.– the phrasing here seems to imply that Hilary continued to intensify after it peaked in intensity. Maybe something like "by the time of its peak, Hilary had been rapidly intensifying for a continuous 48-hour period following its formation"?
The combined system, which included the remnants of Hilary continued moving through the western United States, eventually crossing into Canada.– this is a little clunky. I'd add a comma after 'Hilary', replace the one after 'States' with an 'and', and replace 'crossing' with 'crossed'.
The first issued a flood watch on August 17– the first what?
by President Joe Biden, and Biden urged– 'and Biden' -> 'who'
Local states of emergency were declared in Los Angeles, Palm Springs, and in Indio– I don't think the second 'in' is necessary.
strong enough to knock down a few treesappears twice a couple sentences apart.
beneficial with helping extinguish-> "beneficial, helping to extinguish"
|lang=es
added as parameters.|url-access=limited
added as parameters, since the sites hosting those sources allow visitors to access only a certain amount of content before requiring payment.Alright, with the latest changes, I am happy to pass this article. Excellent work again, HH. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hurricane Hilary article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 14 days
![]() |
![]() | Hurricane Hilary has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 21, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is a current
featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to
meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{ Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() |
|
![]() | On 20 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Hurricane Hilary (2023) to Hurricane Hilary. The result of the discussion was moved. |
![]() | This
edit request to
Hurricane Hilary (2023) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add under the impact section that 6.00 in (152 mm) of rain fell in Bristlecone, setting a preliminary state record. Source:
https://x.com/nwswpc/status/1693460051946807403?s=46&t=w8Gp3NcH6th9VzdY5gs4Pw (I know it’s a tweet but it’s directly from the WPC)
2610:130:109:12:6DCE:2418:948B:2085 (
talk)
21:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm sorry for all the trouble. Also, deleting the source was an accident and I was trying to get it back for you. I'll just stay out of this discussion. Thanks. LoveHop123 ( talk) 00:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Drdpw: If an earthquake is brought up on an article about a hurricane, I think it's important to unambiguously explain that it's just a coincidence, and why it is. I can't really imagine a situation where it's worth mentioning an earthquake happened at the same time, but *not* worth mentioning that they're unrelated. I've personally seen several people guessing they were related, so a debunk doesn't seem frivolous to me, personally. Of course it's obvious to us that it's not related, but I think it's not fair to assume everyone reading the page will implicitly know that already. exoplanetaryscience ( talk) 04:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
How much damages did the storm do? [2] The headline of FOX5 says that there was minimal damage but then later says it was just normal (and it also might only be tallying Baja California's and San Diego's damages). While looking up "Hurricane Hilary damages" brings up article after article describing catastrophic damages. ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 15:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
This storm made it to British Columbia, Alberta and Saskatchewan, shouldn't it merit some mention? -- 64.16.13.2 ( talk) 20:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
We really got to put one in soon. It’s off the noaa billions list, and Aon likely doesn’t have an update until January at earliest. We have the $600m estimate - should we put that in? 70.23.39.2 ( talk) 22:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Hurricanehink ( talk · contribs) 04:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Dylan620 ( talk · contribs) 22:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
I have this article watchlisted and have been noticing the nominator's work on it; looking forward to reviewing, which I should be able to begin within the next few days. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
In Mexico, the hurricane...)
The origins of Hilary was– either 'origin' or 'were'
By the time of its peak, Hilary commenced a 48 hour period of intensification following its development.– the phrasing here seems to imply that Hilary continued to intensify after it peaked in intensity. Maybe something like "by the time of its peak, Hilary had been rapidly intensifying for a continuous 48-hour period following its formation"?
The combined system, which included the remnants of Hilary continued moving through the western United States, eventually crossing into Canada.– this is a little clunky. I'd add a comma after 'Hilary', replace the one after 'States' with an 'and', and replace 'crossing' with 'crossed'.
The first issued a flood watch on August 17– the first what?
by President Joe Biden, and Biden urged– 'and Biden' -> 'who'
Local states of emergency were declared in Los Angeles, Palm Springs, and in Indio– I don't think the second 'in' is necessary.
strong enough to knock down a few treesappears twice a couple sentences apart.
beneficial with helping extinguish-> "beneficial, helping to extinguish"
|lang=es
added as parameters.|url-access=limited
added as parameters, since the sites hosting those sources allow visitors to access only a certain amount of content before requiring payment.Alright, with the latest changes, I am happy to pass this article. Excellent work again, HH. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)