This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hurricane Hector (2018) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Hurricane Hector (2018) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Hurricane Hector (2018) is part of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 31, 2023. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone please clarify what the issues are in this article? I honestly saw very few spelling/grammatical mistakes when I checked it. I didn't really see much in terms of flow problems either. Figfires Send me a message! 17:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC) |- wait where did u find this out Derpdadoodle ( talk) 00:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Can someone please get a new picture for this storm? The picture is seriously outdated. Brandontracker (talk) 1:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
I have noticed we are fighting about whether or not to have subsections in this article. Personally, with the way the merge proposal is going, we should have subsections as it appears the article will be kept. The subsections will allow editors to write and readers to read about a specific aspect of the meteorological history. It would work much better with them. Figfires Send me a message! 19:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Since Hector is now dead, we should start discussing subsections again. I personally think that it would make it better. Grammarguruguy ( talk) 16:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't think that there's enough content for subsections right now. I believe that there should be a Genevieve-like expansion on its meteorological before thinking on subdivisions. ABC paulista ( talk) 16:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Derpdadoodle ( talk · contribs) 14:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to review Hurricane Hector (2018) and conclude if it is GA criteria. DerpieDerpie:D 14:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
DerpieDerpie :D 16:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
After I have seen plausible evidence of this article, I am proud to conclude that therefore, in my opinion, this article should be turned into a good article. DerpieDerpie :D 16:29, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
If possible, I need someone who would be willing to review four articles for A-class over an unknown time period. Please note that Hector and Walaka both did not receive comprehensive good article reviews (I was a new user when they were just passed without much of a review). Hence the reason why I have completely rewritten Hector and am beginning to rewrite Walaka. Noah Talk 22:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hurricane Hector (2018) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Hurricane Hector (2018) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Hurricane Hector (2018) is part of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 31, 2023. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone please clarify what the issues are in this article? I honestly saw very few spelling/grammatical mistakes when I checked it. I didn't really see much in terms of flow problems either. Figfires Send me a message! 17:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC) |- wait where did u find this out Derpdadoodle ( talk) 00:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Can someone please get a new picture for this storm? The picture is seriously outdated. Brandontracker (talk) 1:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
I have noticed we are fighting about whether or not to have subsections in this article. Personally, with the way the merge proposal is going, we should have subsections as it appears the article will be kept. The subsections will allow editors to write and readers to read about a specific aspect of the meteorological history. It would work much better with them. Figfires Send me a message! 19:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Since Hector is now dead, we should start discussing subsections again. I personally think that it would make it better. Grammarguruguy ( talk) 16:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't think that there's enough content for subsections right now. I believe that there should be a Genevieve-like expansion on its meteorological before thinking on subdivisions. ABC paulista ( talk) 16:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Derpdadoodle ( talk · contribs) 14:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to review Hurricane Hector (2018) and conclude if it is GA criteria. DerpieDerpie:D 14:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
DerpieDerpie :D 16:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
After I have seen plausible evidence of this article, I am proud to conclude that therefore, in my opinion, this article should be turned into a good article. DerpieDerpie :D 16:29, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
If possible, I need someone who would be willing to review four articles for A-class over an unknown time period. Please note that Hector and Walaka both did not receive comprehensive good article reviews (I was a new user when they were just passed without much of a review). Hence the reason why I have completely rewritten Hector and am beginning to rewrite Walaka. Noah Talk 22:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)