![]() | Hurricane Felicia (2009) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Just as a heads up, I will be updating this article tonight as the tropical cyclone report has been released. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 13:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jsayre64 (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
At a glance, this article appears to have exceptionally consistent citations and plenty of illustrations. I'll actually start the review later this evening or tomorrow. -- Jsayre64 (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I have no major concerns about this article so far.
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Felicia (2009)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Keep it updated; search for more preps/impact info as it becomes available. – Juliancolton | Talk 20:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 20:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Hurricane Felicia (2009) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Just as a heads up, I will be updating this article tonight as the tropical cyclone report has been released. Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 13:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jsayre64 (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
At a glance, this article appears to have exceptionally consistent citations and plenty of illustrations. I'll actually start the review later this evening or tomorrow. -- Jsayre64 (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I have no major concerns about this article so far.
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Felicia (2009)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Keep it updated; search for more preps/impact info as it becomes available. – Juliancolton | Talk 20:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 20:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)