This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hurricane Erin (2001) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Hurricane Erin (2001) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
November 9, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
Hurricane Erin was the longest-lived hurricane of the
2001 Atlantic hurricane season? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Nice job hink. Start for now. |Mitch azenia 19:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1. It is well written. PASS
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. PASS
3. It is broad in its coverage. PASS
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. PASS
5. It is stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism, or proposals to split/merge the article content. PASS
6. It contains images. SO-SO, BUT ADDITIONAL IMAGES CAN BE ADDED
Nice job at creating this article. Only possible recommendation is that some damage pictures (such as from Bermuda) can possibly be added, and that some slightly more detail can be added into the preparations and impact sections. Otherwise, no problems can be seen. Good job!
By the way, what is the ID number of this article (reviewed version)? How do I add the reviewed version? Please help. CapeVerdeWave 12:00, 15 November 2006, (UTC)
This is a cool image of Hurricane Erin and 9/11 [1]. -- Irfan Faiz 23:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 03:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
... and will rather be burned on the stake than testing data for evidence of weather modification [2] (which is illegal since 1978 [3]).
The main article must mention that a 911 conspiracy theorist -- Prof. Judy Wood [4] -- reports an astonishing con-incidence -- namely that Erin was heading towards NYC and abruptly changed course 130 (?) degrees at precisely (?) the time when Silverstein's WTC towers collapsed (in under 10 seconds, wink wink, nudge nudge). OK, it was about that time that Erin did change course -- when it was no longer needed to cover up a possible false flag operation mishap. This is a verifiable fact in that the observed synchronous circumstances are statistically astronomically unlikely. Should this be covered up -- it is another conspiracy -- and that's no april fool's joke. 124.197.44.44 ( talk) 11:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I was tempted to remove this, but I'll humor you. ZOMG IT WAS ALL CHENEY'S FAULT! GAHHH!!!! ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 14:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I think it should be prominently displayed, it's very important! (to show how ridiculous conspiracy theorists, especially that one, are). Batvette ( talk) 15:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
It is strange how prior to the attacks this wasn't mentioned on the news. Shouldn't a hurricane of that size have had a massive amount of media attention as it was headed towards New York??? Normally these storms are tracked and predicted days in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.200.188.166 ( talk) 16:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
This line seems like it has missing information:
"On September 9 Erin intensified into a hurricane while located 275 miles (440 km), ..."
While located 275 miles where? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.83.133.235 ( talk) 15:37, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Erin (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hurricane Erin (2001) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Hurricane Erin (2001) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
November 9, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
Hurricane Erin was the longest-lived hurricane of the
2001 Atlantic hurricane season? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Nice job hink. Start for now. |Mitch azenia 19:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
1. It is well written. PASS
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. PASS
3. It is broad in its coverage. PASS
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. PASS
5. It is stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism, or proposals to split/merge the article content. PASS
6. It contains images. SO-SO, BUT ADDITIONAL IMAGES CAN BE ADDED
Nice job at creating this article. Only possible recommendation is that some damage pictures (such as from Bermuda) can possibly be added, and that some slightly more detail can be added into the preparations and impact sections. Otherwise, no problems can be seen. Good job!
By the way, what is the ID number of this article (reviewed version)? How do I add the reviewed version? Please help. CapeVerdeWave 12:00, 15 November 2006, (UTC)
This is a cool image of Hurricane Erin and 9/11 [1]. -- Irfan Faiz 23:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 03:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
... and will rather be burned on the stake than testing data for evidence of weather modification [2] (which is illegal since 1978 [3]).
The main article must mention that a 911 conspiracy theorist -- Prof. Judy Wood [4] -- reports an astonishing con-incidence -- namely that Erin was heading towards NYC and abruptly changed course 130 (?) degrees at precisely (?) the time when Silverstein's WTC towers collapsed (in under 10 seconds, wink wink, nudge nudge). OK, it was about that time that Erin did change course -- when it was no longer needed to cover up a possible false flag operation mishap. This is a verifiable fact in that the observed synchronous circumstances are statistically astronomically unlikely. Should this be covered up -- it is another conspiracy -- and that's no april fool's joke. 124.197.44.44 ( talk) 11:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I was tempted to remove this, but I'll humor you. ZOMG IT WAS ALL CHENEY'S FAULT! GAHHH!!!! ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 14:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I think it should be prominently displayed, it's very important! (to show how ridiculous conspiracy theorists, especially that one, are). Batvette ( talk) 15:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
It is strange how prior to the attacks this wasn't mentioned on the news. Shouldn't a hurricane of that size have had a massive amount of media attention as it was headed towards New York??? Normally these storms are tracked and predicted days in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.200.188.166 ( talk) 16:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
This line seems like it has missing information:
"On September 9 Erin intensified into a hurricane while located 275 miles (440 km), ..."
While located 275 miles where? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.83.133.235 ( talk) 15:37, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Erin (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)