GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 06:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
With my issues addressed/resolved, I can now state with confidence that this article follows the policies on prose, grammar, intro and body organization, and general composition of text at a quality worthy of GA level!
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
17:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
The article makes frequent citations to a sturdy list of sources which all click as reliable. No original research looks to have been incorporated into the text.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The article appears to contain all relevant information which was attainable for the topic. Nothing resembles trivia or fluff.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I could readily comprehend the way to show bias towards or against a hurricane, at any rate without obviously sounding unencyclopedic, but nevertheless this article most certainly does not do that.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Looking at the edit history back as far as July last year, no edit warring or editing of similar nature seems to have taken place.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
05:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
All three images currently used in the article are validly licensed, and as they are from the Wikimedia Commons I don't think fair use issues apply in this case.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
05:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Before I give this article the "GA-OK", I'd just like to be clear in my understanding of the following:
Other than that, everything's adorned with a green light. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! ( talk) 06:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 06:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
With my issues addressed/resolved, I can now state with confidence that this article follows the policies on prose, grammar, intro and body organization, and general composition of text at a quality worthy of GA level!
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
17:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
The article makes frequent citations to a sturdy list of sources which all click as reliable. No original research looks to have been incorporated into the text.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The article appears to contain all relevant information which was attainable for the topic. Nothing resembles trivia or fluff.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I could readily comprehend the way to show bias towards or against a hurricane, at any rate without obviously sounding unencyclopedic, but nevertheless this article most certainly does not do that.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
06:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Looking at the edit history back as far as July last year, no edit warring or editing of similar nature seems to have taken place.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
05:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
All three images currently used in the article are validly licensed, and as they are from the Wikimedia Commons I don't think fair use issues apply in this case.
Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (
talk)
05:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Before I give this article the "GA-OK", I'd just like to be clear in my understanding of the following:
Other than that, everything's adorned with a green light. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! ( talk) 06:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)