This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Hurricane Emily (1993) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
Hurricane Emily (1993) is part of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 22, 2021. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Too little info here for not notable enough of a storm, IMO. It caused very little damage and deaths, did not make landfall. I think it should be merged. Hurricanehink 20:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Yep, you guessed it...better intro, more impact! This article is almost there though. Jdorje 01:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 02:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Hurricanehink! I will be reviewing this article tonight. As always, the article you submitted is decent and just short of being worthy of consideration for Good Article status. Here are my concerns:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Emily (1993). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Emily (1993). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello everyone, I think that "as a result of Emily" at the end of the intro is unneeded verbosity and should be removed. I also think "The storm downed thousands of trees and wrecked 553 homes—168 of which completely destroyed—" reads rather awkwardly and needs to be revised. I'm not saying my proposed solution is the be all end all, and maybe there is a better way to rephrase but the current version really needs to go. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:207D:E29F:2835:885A ( talk) 22 July 2021
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Hurricane Emily (1993) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
Hurricane Emily (1993) is part of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 22, 2021. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Too little info here for not notable enough of a storm, IMO. It caused very little damage and deaths, did not make landfall. I think it should be merged. Hurricanehink 20:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Yep, you guessed it...better intro, more impact! This article is almost there though. Jdorje 01:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 02:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Hurricanehink! I will be reviewing this article tonight. As always, the article you submitted is decent and just short of being worthy of consideration for Good Article status. Here are my concerns:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Emily (1993). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Emily (1993). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello everyone, I think that "as a result of Emily" at the end of the intro is unneeded verbosity and should be removed. I also think "The storm downed thousands of trees and wrecked 553 homes—168 of which completely destroyed—" reads rather awkwardly and needs to be revised. I'm not saying my proposed solution is the be all end all, and maybe there is a better way to rephrase but the current version really needs to go. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:207D:E29F:2835:885A ( talk) 22 July 2021