![]() | Hurricane Darby (2016) has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 24, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Juliancolton ( talk · contribs) 03:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article against the GA criteria. I'll start at the beginning and leave comments as I go along...
Overall, it looks solid and seems to meet most of the GA criteria. Just a few minor suggestions for improvements. Placing the nomination on-hold for now, but I anticipate passing the article very soon. Nice work! – Juliancolton | Talk 03:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Hurricane Darby (2016) has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 24, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Juliancolton ( talk · contribs) 03:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article against the GA criteria. I'll start at the beginning and leave comments as I go along...
Overall, it looks solid and seems to meet most of the GA criteria. Just a few minor suggestions for improvements. Placing the nomination on-hold for now, but I anticipate passing the article very soon. Nice work! – Juliancolton | Talk 03:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)