![]() | Hurricane Claudette (2003) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 16, 2014. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A good little article. But I know the impact section can be extended. Jdorje 04:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
It says Claudette was the first Cane to strike the US since Bertha. Uh, I may be wrong buit it seems like there were a few more. Ahem...
I'm not gona change it just yet. Not until somebodey else sees how wrong a mark that was. Who made that call? Cyclone1 01:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I bumped it to A-class. A couple of comments.
— jdorje ( talk) 05:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I put it up for FAC. Here goes nothing. Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Why did we change pictures? The one we had before was more impressive, I think, albeit black and white. -- § Hurricane E RIC § Damages archive 02:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
The rainfall image was updated to include Mexican amounts and place a color-filled image. It doesn't look much different, actually, but it appears to be complete. Thegreatdr 20:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
What should we be linking to in this section? It seems kind of pointless to point at List of notable Atlantic hurricanes from storms which well, are not exactly notable. Any ideas?-- Nilfanion ( talk) 10:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm brand new to Wikipedia, but as I learn more about it, I'm finding that changes to articles of this caliber are best meshed out in the Talk section first. Before I realized that, I made a couple of changes to the article that reflect the surprise elements of the storm. As this storm hit us hard, I know that it was at least 12 hours ahead of schedule and much stronger than it was advertised. I tried to cite sources in the archives of the NHC and in a report put out by NWS-Corpus Christi. If anyone can give me pointers on how to cite, I would appreciate it. I see what y'all have done, but I don't see it explained that way in the Help section of Wikipedia. It's Greek to me. user:Scarro66
I found this image on the NASA site of Claudette. Might be useful?-- Nilfanion ( talk) 21:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
@ Hurricanehink and Cyclonebiskit:, this 2006 FA needs a bit of tune-up to meet WP:WIAFA. I found no indications of too close paraphrasing, copyvio, or problems with copying within Wikipedia, but the following need attention:
Best regards, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
There also seems to be some unrepresented research -
Not all that much about this one, but considering that no scholarly analysis is represented in this article, the sourcing cannot be really considered comprehensive. Pinging SandyGeorgia so they are aware of these comments. Hog Farm Talk 02:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Hurricane Claudette (2003) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 16, 2014. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A good little article. But I know the impact section can be extended. Jdorje 04:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
It says Claudette was the first Cane to strike the US since Bertha. Uh, I may be wrong buit it seems like there were a few more. Ahem...
I'm not gona change it just yet. Not until somebodey else sees how wrong a mark that was. Who made that call? Cyclone1 01:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I bumped it to A-class. A couple of comments.
— jdorje ( talk) 05:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I put it up for FAC. Here goes nothing. Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Why did we change pictures? The one we had before was more impressive, I think, albeit black and white. -- § Hurricane E RIC § Damages archive 02:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
The rainfall image was updated to include Mexican amounts and place a color-filled image. It doesn't look much different, actually, but it appears to be complete. Thegreatdr 20:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
What should we be linking to in this section? It seems kind of pointless to point at List of notable Atlantic hurricanes from storms which well, are not exactly notable. Any ideas?-- Nilfanion ( talk) 10:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm brand new to Wikipedia, but as I learn more about it, I'm finding that changes to articles of this caliber are best meshed out in the Talk section first. Before I realized that, I made a couple of changes to the article that reflect the surprise elements of the storm. As this storm hit us hard, I know that it was at least 12 hours ahead of schedule and much stronger than it was advertised. I tried to cite sources in the archives of the NHC and in a report put out by NWS-Corpus Christi. If anyone can give me pointers on how to cite, I would appreciate it. I see what y'all have done, but I don't see it explained that way in the Help section of Wikipedia. It's Greek to me. user:Scarro66
I found this image on the NASA site of Claudette. Might be useful?-- Nilfanion ( talk) 21:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
@ Hurricanehink and Cyclonebiskit:, this 2006 FA needs a bit of tune-up to meet WP:WIAFA. I found no indications of too close paraphrasing, copyvio, or problems with copying within Wikipedia, but the following need attention:
Best regards, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
There also seems to be some unrepresented research -
Not all that much about this one, but considering that no scholarly analysis is represented in this article, the sourcing cannot be really considered comprehensive. Pinging SandyGeorgia so they are aware of these comments. Hog Farm Talk 02:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)