![]() | Hurricane Cindy (2005) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on November 10, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
NO NO NO NO! Why in God's name are we creating subpages! This is a NON-NOTABLE storm. This is ridiculous. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Completely agreed. This, Arlene, and many of the other storms could simple be condensed on the main article. Who cares about the loss of information? This is an encyclopedia, not a weather encyclopedia but just an encyclopedia. I understand that it is fairly current so there would be more interest in it, but 1995 should be used as a guide to keep 2005 season shorter than necessary, if that is the reasoning behind this page. If that isn't the reason, I don't know what is. We don't need an article on every last storm! Hurricanehink 04:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Tropical Storm Cindy was a notable storm, but very much overshadowed by the many monsters that followed. This storm caused some significant damage (though not totally severe), flooding in many areas around here (I live in southeast Louisiana), hit New Orleans directly, and was still fresh on everyone's minds as Katrina approached (the mess left by Cindy was still mentioned as late as a week before Katrina annihilated my area). This storm should have an article... heck, if I had more time, I was planning on creating this article myself! We just need to put in a bit more research on how extensive its impact was... Now an article on Arlene, which I noticed was recently deleted... now that was not notable at all... Cindy was notable... Keep the article. Hey, if we can have an article on Tropical Storm Odette (2003), I think an article on a much more notable storm like this is warranted. PenguinCDF 21:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
This argument is ridiculous. Using the same logic, let's go through and delete articles on Governors of Maryland and merge them into one large page since a lot of them weren't *cough* "notable". That doesn't make sense, and neither does this. Let it go. -- tomf688{ talk} 21:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Isnt the point of wikipedia to have as much information as possible? and there is a lot more information in this article than the season article. Obviously there would be no point making articles on some hurricanes, like Nate, but if someone did make one on Nate then, as long as it has more info than the season page, keep it! Jamie C 11:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
To make a compromise, I think that if the TCR says it's a hurricane, we keep the separate article. If it stays a tropical storm, merge it. Fair enough? Icelandic Hurricane 22:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Keep it, the storm was big news in Georgia where there was a tornado at the Atlanta Motor Speedway. Also that one tornado was estimated to have done at least $40 million worth or damage. Also, why isn't that in the damages section? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Silence Knight ( talk • contribs) .
Sources seem to be fairly easy to google up: http://msn.foxsports.com/nascar/story/3744894 for example. -- AySz88^ - ^ 18:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed the line that said internal sources suggest... because the link given as a citation no longer has information relevant to Cindy... In fact it talks about Epsilon. Please replace this sentence when appopriate. Perhaps it was a bit redundant with the sentence before it as well... Hopquick 17:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
-- AySz88^ - ^ 20:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC) (forgot to sign)
It says 320M dollars in damage-gonna add that? HurricaneCraze32 20:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
The impact section needs more work.-- Nilfanion ( talk) 23:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
These should be included in the article. Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I think it is pretty close to being ready. Anyone else have thoughts on the matter? Plasticup T/ C 15:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer ( talk) 18:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
A very well written article - I find no issues that need to be corrected. Due to this, I am passing the article to GA status. Congrats! Dana boomer ( talk) 18:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Cindy (2005)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Needs a citation overhaul. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 22:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Looks good. Now just add some more preps and send it off to GAN. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 15:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Cindy (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Cindy (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.delrionewsherald.com/story.lasso?ewcd=8d3a20080e1b17efWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
The tornado outbreak article is start-class and isn't terribly long. I propose merging the tornado outbreak article into this article, and have the chart be collapsible. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 14:46, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Hurricane Cindy (2005) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on November 10, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
NO NO NO NO! Why in God's name are we creating subpages! This is a NON-NOTABLE storm. This is ridiculous. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Completely agreed. This, Arlene, and many of the other storms could simple be condensed on the main article. Who cares about the loss of information? This is an encyclopedia, not a weather encyclopedia but just an encyclopedia. I understand that it is fairly current so there would be more interest in it, but 1995 should be used as a guide to keep 2005 season shorter than necessary, if that is the reasoning behind this page. If that isn't the reason, I don't know what is. We don't need an article on every last storm! Hurricanehink 04:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Tropical Storm Cindy was a notable storm, but very much overshadowed by the many monsters that followed. This storm caused some significant damage (though not totally severe), flooding in many areas around here (I live in southeast Louisiana), hit New Orleans directly, and was still fresh on everyone's minds as Katrina approached (the mess left by Cindy was still mentioned as late as a week before Katrina annihilated my area). This storm should have an article... heck, if I had more time, I was planning on creating this article myself! We just need to put in a bit more research on how extensive its impact was... Now an article on Arlene, which I noticed was recently deleted... now that was not notable at all... Cindy was notable... Keep the article. Hey, if we can have an article on Tropical Storm Odette (2003), I think an article on a much more notable storm like this is warranted. PenguinCDF 21:01, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
This argument is ridiculous. Using the same logic, let's go through and delete articles on Governors of Maryland and merge them into one large page since a lot of them weren't *cough* "notable". That doesn't make sense, and neither does this. Let it go. -- tomf688{ talk} 21:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Isnt the point of wikipedia to have as much information as possible? and there is a lot more information in this article than the season article. Obviously there would be no point making articles on some hurricanes, like Nate, but if someone did make one on Nate then, as long as it has more info than the season page, keep it! Jamie C 11:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
To make a compromise, I think that if the TCR says it's a hurricane, we keep the separate article. If it stays a tropical storm, merge it. Fair enough? Icelandic Hurricane 22:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Keep it, the storm was big news in Georgia where there was a tornado at the Atlanta Motor Speedway. Also that one tornado was estimated to have done at least $40 million worth or damage. Also, why isn't that in the damages section? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Silence Knight ( talk • contribs) .
Sources seem to be fairly easy to google up: http://msn.foxsports.com/nascar/story/3744894 for example. -- AySz88^ - ^ 18:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed the line that said internal sources suggest... because the link given as a citation no longer has information relevant to Cindy... In fact it talks about Epsilon. Please replace this sentence when appopriate. Perhaps it was a bit redundant with the sentence before it as well... Hopquick 17:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
-- AySz88^ - ^ 20:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC) (forgot to sign)
It says 320M dollars in damage-gonna add that? HurricaneCraze32 20:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
The impact section needs more work.-- Nilfanion ( talk) 23:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
These should be included in the article. Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I think it is pretty close to being ready. Anyone else have thoughts on the matter? Plasticup T/ C 15:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer ( talk) 18:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
A very well written article - I find no issues that need to be corrected. Due to this, I am passing the article to GA status. Congrats! Dana boomer ( talk) 18:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Cindy (2005)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Needs a citation overhaul. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 22:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Looks good. Now just add some more preps and send it off to GAN. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 15:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Cindy (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Cindy (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.delrionewsherald.com/story.lasso?ewcd=8d3a20080e1b17efWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
The tornado outbreak article is start-class and isn't terribly long. I propose merging the tornado outbreak article into this article, and have the chart be collapsible. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 14:46, 26 September 2018 (UTC)