(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
The prose is clear and concise. I changed some of the wording, but other than that, the spelling and grammar was of good quality. One reference was misspelled, but the error was easily fixed.
There are 27 sources on this article. One of them, the Tropical Cyclone Report (TCR) for Hurricane Bud, provides more general information about the storm and is from a trusted source (NHC). Many of the rest are also from the NHC, and are more specific about the evolution of the storm. The sources used for impact and preparations are also reliable (such as trusted newspapers).
Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
Citations lead to reliable sources.
Pass
(c) (original research)
There is no original research
Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)
There is no copyright violations or plagiarism
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
This article covers all of the aspects of Bud's lifetime as a tropical cyclone. For the information that is available on the storm, its meteorological history is discussed in good depth as well as the impact and preparations.
Pass
(b) (focused)
This article is focused
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
This article is neutral and covers the topic without bias
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
The article does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
All images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
The images are appropriately used with suitable captions
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Pass
This article is well-written, has an appropriate amount of images, and covers the lifetime of Hurricane Bud in appropriate depth for the amount of information that there is to work with.
Discussion
References
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
The prose is clear and concise. I changed some of the wording, but other than that, the spelling and grammar was of good quality. One reference was misspelled, but the error was easily fixed.
There are 27 sources on this article. One of them, the Tropical Cyclone Report (TCR) for Hurricane Bud, provides more general information about the storm and is from a trusted source (NHC). Many of the rest are also from the NHC, and are more specific about the evolution of the storm. The sources used for impact and preparations are also reliable (such as trusted newspapers).
Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)
Citations lead to reliable sources.
Pass
(c) (original research)
There is no original research
Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)
There is no copyright violations or plagiarism
Pass
Broad in its coverage:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (major aspects)
This article covers all of the aspects of Bud's lifetime as a tropical cyclone. For the information that is available on the storm, its meteorological history is discussed in good depth as well as the impact and preparations.
Pass
(b) (focused)
This article is focused
Pass
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
This article is neutral and covers the topic without bias
Pass
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
The article does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
All images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
The images are appropriately used with suitable captions
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Pass
This article is well-written, has an appropriate amount of images, and covers the lifetime of Hurricane Bud in appropriate depth for the amount of information that there is to work with.
Discussion
References
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.