![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Azure,
no, we cannot name any territorial encircling that would exactly cover where the military operations took place since it's impossible. Present-day Slovakia cannot be, because it's anachronism, did not exist then. As well the operations covered territories even outside of the territory of present-day Slovakia indeed, so it would be twice as more erroneous. Just because some article have present-X, is not binding, artcile are continously improved again anachronism (however, in brackets may be mentioned). Moreover, Slovakia did not exist officially since 1918, not even Czechoslovakia, which became internationally recognized with her new borders in 1920 (as well, inside the regions were established only in 1928, officially). Upper Hungary adequately covers the territory in an inclusive way.( KIENGIR ( talk) 21:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC))
Displayed flag of Czechoslovakia is wrong. Please correct it as per: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%8Ceskoslovensk%C3%A1_vlajka
94.112.179.31 ( talk) 01:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Even though I've edited the infobox to display the correct information, this article keeps getting changed without a reason given. Since I don't want to have a pointless edit war I'll list my grievances here. The problem is, the article argues that the actual Hungarian army collapsed in the front of a Czechoslovak counteroffensive. This is literally stated in the article:
The recapture of Zvolen meant a combat turnaround. The Czechoslovak Army took the initiative and attacked the Hungarians in two directions: Levice (Léva) and LuÄenec (Losonc). Weekly battles exploded and all Hungarian advances were exhausted. The Hungarian Army Command agreed with the ceasefire and retreated to the demarcation line
As a result, it is completely unreasonable to write that the Hungarian army was victorious but retreated only after diplomatic pressure: this is not what *the article itself* states. As I wrote in one of my edit summaries (which was ignored): "Negotations with the Entente are unsourced and not mentioned in the article, although if the included sources and bibliography talk about this aspect, it should be actually added to the article rather than just casually thrown around like that." And also: "No, it wasn't a Hungarian victory, the article - and other articles - clearly argues how the Romanian successes enabled the Czechoslovak army to crush the Hungarians and push them back - nothing to do with diplomacy, which factored in later."
I think this situation ought to be resolved because it makes no sense for an outcome to be stubbornly changed to reflect the opposite of what the actual article talks about. -- Dynamo128 ( talk) 13:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Azure,
no, we cannot name any territorial encircling that would exactly cover where the military operations took place since it's impossible. Present-day Slovakia cannot be, because it's anachronism, did not exist then. As well the operations covered territories even outside of the territory of present-day Slovakia indeed, so it would be twice as more erroneous. Just because some article have present-X, is not binding, artcile are continously improved again anachronism (however, in brackets may be mentioned). Moreover, Slovakia did not exist officially since 1918, not even Czechoslovakia, which became internationally recognized with her new borders in 1920 (as well, inside the regions were established only in 1928, officially). Upper Hungary adequately covers the territory in an inclusive way.( KIENGIR ( talk) 21:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC))
Displayed flag of Czechoslovakia is wrong. Please correct it as per: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%8Ceskoslovensk%C3%A1_vlajka
94.112.179.31 ( talk) 01:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Even though I've edited the infobox to display the correct information, this article keeps getting changed without a reason given. Since I don't want to have a pointless edit war I'll list my grievances here. The problem is, the article argues that the actual Hungarian army collapsed in the front of a Czechoslovak counteroffensive. This is literally stated in the article:
The recapture of Zvolen meant a combat turnaround. The Czechoslovak Army took the initiative and attacked the Hungarians in two directions: Levice (Léva) and LuÄenec (Losonc). Weekly battles exploded and all Hungarian advances were exhausted. The Hungarian Army Command agreed with the ceasefire and retreated to the demarcation line
As a result, it is completely unreasonable to write that the Hungarian army was victorious but retreated only after diplomatic pressure: this is not what *the article itself* states. As I wrote in one of my edit summaries (which was ignored): "Negotations with the Entente are unsourced and not mentioned in the article, although if the included sources and bibliography talk about this aspect, it should be actually added to the article rather than just casually thrown around like that." And also: "No, it wasn't a Hungarian victory, the article - and other articles - clearly argues how the Romanian successes enabled the Czechoslovak army to crush the Hungarians and push them back - nothing to do with diplomacy, which factored in later."
I think this situation ought to be resolved because it makes no sense for an outcome to be stubbornly changed to reflect the opposite of what the actual article talks about. -- Dynamo128 ( talk) 13:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)