![]() | Hung for the Holidays has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 11, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hung for the Holidays article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Вик Ретлхед ( talk · contribs) 07:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
This article seems short and it shouldn't take me more than a couple of days to review it.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Final words: Honestly, I don't think this is a GA material. The article is too short and is missing some essential sections mentioned in the WP:MOS-ALBUM. I appreciate the effort, but this topic simply doesn't have the potential to be promoted to good article.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 12:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Conclusion:I think this article needs a serious re-building to meet the GA criteria. As far as I noted, the prose is poorly written, it is not broad in its coverage, it contains trivia and basic grammatical errors. In its current state it is barely a C-class article, and far away for B. I am closing the review as failed.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 20:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri ( talk · contribs) 02:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll take this. Longest unreviewed. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Good Article Checklist
Good Article review progress box
|
Comments: This article is very short, but I still checked it through. The lead is very short, but given that the article text is also very short, that is typically fine. Though I'd like some expansion, some details on the sounds and I found the actual reviews to be a bit shorter than I'd like it to be. Meaning that it is on the edge of the context I'd like to see.
The prose needs some work on sentences like "A second album was first announced in May 2004, and the EP was recorded during the summer time of that year." For the lead, this should be much tighter and stronger. This lacks impact and so does the next sentence.
Please add additional reviews or details like Huffington Post labeling it the "best worst" - [1] Or it being labeled a "cult classic" from NY Daily News [2] He did do some signings and such following the release. [3] I'm seeing a lot of little things, but just a few more would round this out better. I'm going to place this one hold for fixes. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Hung for the Holidays has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 11, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hung for the Holidays article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Вик Ретлхед ( talk · contribs) 07:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
This article seems short and it shouldn't take me more than a couple of days to review it.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Final words: Honestly, I don't think this is a GA material. The article is too short and is missing some essential sections mentioned in the WP:MOS-ALBUM. I appreciate the effort, but this topic simply doesn't have the potential to be promoted to good article.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 12:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Conclusion:I think this article needs a serious re-building to meet the GA criteria. As far as I noted, the prose is poorly written, it is not broad in its coverage, it contains trivia and basic grammatical errors. In its current state it is barely a C-class article, and far away for B. I am closing the review as failed.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 20:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri ( talk · contribs) 02:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC) I'll take this. Longest unreviewed. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Good Article Checklist
Good Article review progress box
|
Comments: This article is very short, but I still checked it through. The lead is very short, but given that the article text is also very short, that is typically fine. Though I'd like some expansion, some details on the sounds and I found the actual reviews to be a bit shorter than I'd like it to be. Meaning that it is on the edge of the context I'd like to see.
The prose needs some work on sentences like "A second album was first announced in May 2004, and the EP was recorded during the summer time of that year." For the lead, this should be much tighter and stronger. This lacks impact and so does the next sentence.
Please add additional reviews or details like Huffington Post labeling it the "best worst" - [1] Or it being labeled a "cult classic" from NY Daily News [2] He did do some signings and such following the release. [3] I'm seeing a lot of little things, but just a few more would round this out better. I'm going to place this one hold for fixes. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)