![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
What's NPOV about this article? 86.136.170.170 02:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty of removing the NPOV tag - unless anyone can state a good reason to reinstate it, I hope that it'll remain this way. BHA 16:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I have some questions about the BHA article, which seems to be a statement of the BHA's understanding of itself.
I also wonder why the controversy over the BHA MORI survey is not covered here?
I'll get a wiki account, and come back - rather than editing anonymously. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.111.168.25 ( talk) 10:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC).
How many members have this organization?-- Vojvodae ist 15:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I have today significantly expanded this article with a new section on the History of the association and additions to the Campaigns section. I work for the BHA so I've added a "Notable Wikipedian" tag for me above; but hopefully you can see I've tried to keep well within the objectivity guidelines and focus especially on the kind of things that are likely to get asked as questions. I think this expansion is warranted in light of the increased media attention and comment the BHA is getting especially after the Atheist Bus Campaign. I agree with the earlier comment that the number of members should be included and I'll confirm and add this soon. Bchurchill ( talk) 17:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
BHA members have just had email notification that Grayling is stepping aside from taking up the position of President of the BHA, because of the New College of the Humanities controversy. I've not added to the main page, because I think it might be better to wait for a more public announcement, but I thought a heads-up would be useful. -- Dannyno ( talk) 18:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
This article relies very heavily on sources from the BHA and has only a minor section on criticism. It does not tip over into advertising or propaganda but seems to lack a completely neutral stance. Philafrenzy ( talk) 10:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
As part of the large swathe of edits a while back, the Distinguished Supporters list was trimmed from the list seen here, to the current single line. I reduced the section due to it being a large amount of information entirely dependent on a single primary source but another editor has raised concern for the change. Should the section be re-expanded to the previous size, stay as it is, or meet somewhere in between? I'm now undecided. Samwalton9 ( talk) 16:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
On his article it says 1982, on the BHA page it says 81. Both are unreferenced. Nothing on history section of BHA site. Seems previous holder left in 1980 so there wasn't an immediate succession. Minor point but obviously at least one is inaccurate. Rayman60 ( talk) 16:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The section on the history of the organisation should be expanded, or there should be a separate page for the Ethical Union. Dadge ( talk) 01:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Humanists UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Humanists UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Humanists UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
What's NPOV about this article? 86.136.170.170 02:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty of removing the NPOV tag - unless anyone can state a good reason to reinstate it, I hope that it'll remain this way. BHA 16:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I have some questions about the BHA article, which seems to be a statement of the BHA's understanding of itself.
I also wonder why the controversy over the BHA MORI survey is not covered here?
I'll get a wiki account, and come back - rather than editing anonymously. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.111.168.25 ( talk) 10:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC).
How many members have this organization?-- Vojvodae ist 15:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I have today significantly expanded this article with a new section on the History of the association and additions to the Campaigns section. I work for the BHA so I've added a "Notable Wikipedian" tag for me above; but hopefully you can see I've tried to keep well within the objectivity guidelines and focus especially on the kind of things that are likely to get asked as questions. I think this expansion is warranted in light of the increased media attention and comment the BHA is getting especially after the Atheist Bus Campaign. I agree with the earlier comment that the number of members should be included and I'll confirm and add this soon. Bchurchill ( talk) 17:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
BHA members have just had email notification that Grayling is stepping aside from taking up the position of President of the BHA, because of the New College of the Humanities controversy. I've not added to the main page, because I think it might be better to wait for a more public announcement, but I thought a heads-up would be useful. -- Dannyno ( talk) 18:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
This article relies very heavily on sources from the BHA and has only a minor section on criticism. It does not tip over into advertising or propaganda but seems to lack a completely neutral stance. Philafrenzy ( talk) 10:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
As part of the large swathe of edits a while back, the Distinguished Supporters list was trimmed from the list seen here, to the current single line. I reduced the section due to it being a large amount of information entirely dependent on a single primary source but another editor has raised concern for the change. Should the section be re-expanded to the previous size, stay as it is, or meet somewhere in between? I'm now undecided. Samwalton9 ( talk) 16:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
On his article it says 1982, on the BHA page it says 81. Both are unreferenced. Nothing on history section of BHA site. Seems previous holder left in 1980 so there wasn't an immediate succession. Minor point but obviously at least one is inaccurate. Rayman60 ( talk) 16:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
The section on the history of the organisation should be expanded, or there should be a separate page for the Ethical Union. Dadge ( talk) 01:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Humanists UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Humanists UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Humanists UK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)