This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Human spaceflight programs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"alphabetically by programme" is unnecessary. I'm moving this page to List of manned space missions. -- Jiang 04:32, 20 Oct 2003 (UTC)
I see that brief mission descriptions have been added for some of these flights. I was planning to start filling in a few more, but taking this to its logical conclusion I would simply be replicating all the information at List of human spaceflights - which seems kind of pointless. What's the view on this? In the interests of avoiding duplication would it be better to remove the flight descriptions here (making sure all info was already at List of human spaceflights) and then just have a plain list of missions here, referring people to List of human spaceflights (and of course the detailed articles about the missions, which are already linked) for further information?
Or maybe just retain the really salient information here (such as first US manned orbital flight, first moon manding etc.) and relegate everything else to the other articles?
Any thoughts?
Matt 19:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I have a number of points on which I would like to improve this article:
So long as I am not stepping on anyones toes by making big modifications here, I will proceed shortly GrampaScience ( talk) 17:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Looking just now I've seen no recent activity or interest in this article, so I may as well begin immediately. GrampaScience ( talk) 17:22, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
It has been proposed (by this anon) to merge List of manned spacecraft into this list. I think the two topics are closely related, but not identical; I think there would be value in having two separate lists. So I'm against the merger; unless anyone objects, I'll remove the merge tags. Mlm42 ( talk) 23:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Given the inclusion of TKS, which has never carried humans from the surface, and space station programmes, I'm thinking of including 'unmanned' manned spacecraft - i.e. ATV, H-II, Dragon and Progress.
This is going to put a squeeze on space, but I think its important. I suggest getting rid of the ones that are 'in development' were cancelled (or putting them in a seperate argument) and putting information about Progress in the Soyuz section as they are virtually identical, and merging Dragon into the CCDev/COTS section as it is the only demonstrated vehicle that has come out of that.
Real manned space programs are always outnumbered by aerospace industry hot air and paper projects. We can keep this article the right size by only listing craft that have actually, you know, been built and sent into space.
If no objections, I will proceed with this shortly. GrampaScience ( talk) 16:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Why there is a Mercury spacecraft shown here, which was a suborbital flight, and Gagarin's Vostok spacecraft not? That makes no sense, and is in-fact a bit ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.17.14.17 ( talk) 20:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Members of the Manned Spaceflight Engineer Program not shown.
204.238.227.14 (
talk) 13:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
On the Soyuz program section on this article it says that the program began in "1913", now I don't know about anyone else but that sounds a little too early as not even the USSR existed yet. So can someone fix it with the right year. Sion8 ( talk) 01:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of human spaceflight programs's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "spaceflightnow.com":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
ftp://130.206.92.88/Espacio/Mesa%20Redonda%205%20-%20R3%20-%20TSNIIMASH%20-%20V%20M%20IVANOV.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
BFR (rocket) should be added, either as part of the existing Dragon 2 section (then a general SpaceX section) or as separate section. — mfb ( talk) 02:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of human spaceflight programs's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "a3-1":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Human spaceflight programs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"alphabetically by programme" is unnecessary. I'm moving this page to List of manned space missions. -- Jiang 04:32, 20 Oct 2003 (UTC)
I see that brief mission descriptions have been added for some of these flights. I was planning to start filling in a few more, but taking this to its logical conclusion I would simply be replicating all the information at List of human spaceflights - which seems kind of pointless. What's the view on this? In the interests of avoiding duplication would it be better to remove the flight descriptions here (making sure all info was already at List of human spaceflights) and then just have a plain list of missions here, referring people to List of human spaceflights (and of course the detailed articles about the missions, which are already linked) for further information?
Or maybe just retain the really salient information here (such as first US manned orbital flight, first moon manding etc.) and relegate everything else to the other articles?
Any thoughts?
Matt 19:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I have a number of points on which I would like to improve this article:
So long as I am not stepping on anyones toes by making big modifications here, I will proceed shortly GrampaScience ( talk) 17:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Looking just now I've seen no recent activity or interest in this article, so I may as well begin immediately. GrampaScience ( talk) 17:22, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
It has been proposed (by this anon) to merge List of manned spacecraft into this list. I think the two topics are closely related, but not identical; I think there would be value in having two separate lists. So I'm against the merger; unless anyone objects, I'll remove the merge tags. Mlm42 ( talk) 23:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Given the inclusion of TKS, which has never carried humans from the surface, and space station programmes, I'm thinking of including 'unmanned' manned spacecraft - i.e. ATV, H-II, Dragon and Progress.
This is going to put a squeeze on space, but I think its important. I suggest getting rid of the ones that are 'in development' were cancelled (or putting them in a seperate argument) and putting information about Progress in the Soyuz section as they are virtually identical, and merging Dragon into the CCDev/COTS section as it is the only demonstrated vehicle that has come out of that.
Real manned space programs are always outnumbered by aerospace industry hot air and paper projects. We can keep this article the right size by only listing craft that have actually, you know, been built and sent into space.
If no objections, I will proceed with this shortly. GrampaScience ( talk) 16:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Why there is a Mercury spacecraft shown here, which was a suborbital flight, and Gagarin's Vostok spacecraft not? That makes no sense, and is in-fact a bit ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.17.14.17 ( talk) 20:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Members of the Manned Spaceflight Engineer Program not shown.
204.238.227.14 (
talk) 13:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
On the Soyuz program section on this article it says that the program began in "1913", now I don't know about anyone else but that sounds a little too early as not even the USSR existed yet. So can someone fix it with the right year. Sion8 ( talk) 01:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of human spaceflight programs's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "spaceflightnow.com":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
ftp://130.206.92.88/Espacio/Mesa%20Redonda%205%20-%20R3%20-%20TSNIIMASH%20-%20V%20M%20IVANOV.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
BFR (rocket) should be added, either as part of the existing Dragon 2 section (then a general SpaceX section) or as separate section. — mfb ( talk) 02:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of human spaceflight programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of human spaceflight programs's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "a3-1":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)