![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ontario E-Laws don't provide a permalink for legislation; you have to search by name from the main site. Even the OHRC official page gets this wrong. Not quite sure how to proceed -- scruss 21:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
I have assigned an initial quality rating of "Start", but the article is in between Stub and Start, IMO. It could use some background information and possibly some media references to debates that took place at the time. I have also moved its importance to "Mid" (from Low) which is debatable - the legislation is a reflection of Ontario's society, at least in theory. PKT ( talk) 19:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I removed this passage because it lacked citations and seems to fail the neutral point of view criteria, either because of undue weight, bias, etc.
"The HRTO stated it that it had no jurisdiction to ordinary people human rights abuse complaint. People who? disagree with HRTO think the principle and intention of the Human Rights Code (Ontario) are to protect public, not just people with protected grounds from human rights abuse." The first part makes no sense, and the second part lacks citation. Legend of 14 ( talk) 02:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ontario E-Laws don't provide a permalink for legislation; you have to search by name from the main site. Even the OHRC official page gets this wrong. Not quite sure how to proceed -- scruss 21:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
I have assigned an initial quality rating of "Start", but the article is in between Stub and Start, IMO. It could use some background information and possibly some media references to debates that took place at the time. I have also moved its importance to "Mid" (from Low) which is debatable - the legislation is a reflection of Ontario's society, at least in theory. PKT ( talk) 19:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I removed this passage because it lacked citations and seems to fail the neutral point of view criteria, either because of undue weight, bias, etc.
"The HRTO stated it that it had no jurisdiction to ordinary people human rights abuse complaint. People who? disagree with HRTO think the principle and intention of the Human Rights Code (Ontario) are to protect public, not just people with protected grounds from human rights abuse." The first part makes no sense, and the second part lacks citation. Legend of 14 ( talk) 02:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)