This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Removed 'resume' tag posted by anonymous user who placed in retaliation for edits on another page. User placed same tag on five pages I have written without explanation. Hugo Barra page is well sourced, well written, highly relevant figure, and considering he is relevant to business/tech, hard to imagine a different method of structuring the article. Wintertanager ( talk) 18:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Does this article read too much like a résumé, and should it be tagged as such until it is brought up to standard? 79.97.226.247 ( talk) 19:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Summoned by bot. I see no major issues with this article to warrant such a tag. Can it be improved upon? Of course. But that would apply to almost every article in WP. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I have to agree with Cwobeel (talk) because I too, do not see such issues that warrants such a tag. I too agree that every article could obviously be improved in some way or form. Now, I honestly don't see Hugo Barra's WP page written as a resume. If you went to another living biography, such as an actor(ess) or a musician, you can see titles that they've been in they've sung in, but that doesn't necessarily make it a full on resume. All in all, I do not see this as such a resume, but ultimately as to the significance of what he has put into those companies. Nick2crosby ( talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Summoned by bot. I can't see where any issues have been raised which justify the tag. The facts seem to be properly sourced. Is there significant information that is not included in the article? Tom (North Shoreman) ( talk) 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Based both on group consensus and page revisions since tag was added, removing resume tag. Wintertanager ( talk) 00:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Hugo Barra. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hugo Barra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Removed 'resume' tag posted by anonymous user who placed in retaliation for edits on another page. User placed same tag on five pages I have written without explanation. Hugo Barra page is well sourced, well written, highly relevant figure, and considering he is relevant to business/tech, hard to imagine a different method of structuring the article. Wintertanager ( talk) 18:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Does this article read too much like a résumé, and should it be tagged as such until it is brought up to standard? 79.97.226.247 ( talk) 19:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Summoned by bot. I see no major issues with this article to warrant such a tag. Can it be improved upon? Of course. But that would apply to almost every article in WP. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I have to agree with Cwobeel (talk) because I too, do not see such issues that warrants such a tag. I too agree that every article could obviously be improved in some way or form. Now, I honestly don't see Hugo Barra's WP page written as a resume. If you went to another living biography, such as an actor(ess) or a musician, you can see titles that they've been in they've sung in, but that doesn't necessarily make it a full on resume. All in all, I do not see this as such a resume, but ultimately as to the significance of what he has put into those companies. Nick2crosby ( talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Summoned by bot. I can't see where any issues have been raised which justify the tag. The facts seem to be properly sourced. Is there significant information that is not included in the article? Tom (North Shoreman) ( talk) 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Based both on group consensus and page revisions since tag was added, removing resume tag. Wintertanager ( talk) 00:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Hugo Barra. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hugo Barra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)