This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, i came across this. In recent discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Article name and missing bridge questions, I was involved in discussion of names and/or wikipedia notability of MRA / MPS / etc. topics. Not sure if this one is wikipedia-notable, perhaps it seems like just an area survey, a specific study, not more meritorious than any other source with info about any NRHPs. Can the notability of this set be asserted? doncram ( talk) 04:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
That said, I would probably consider this notable without that history, as the Hudson Highlands are important in national history as well, and this MRA as a whole shows it.
And to repeat what I said earlier at WT:NRHP, I think we should only have separate MPS articles where the MPS crosses county lines (and has enough listings to justify an article: one of New York's "Movie Palaces of the Tri-Cities" has about one or two listings from Albany, Schenectady and Troy, not really enough for a separate article). MPSes that are listed in one county alone are better off discussed within the listings article for those counties (like, for instance, the Shawangunk Valley or Cornwall MRAs near where I live, where I've written about a number of the entries). Daniel Case ( talk) 16:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hey, i came across this. In recent discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Article name and missing bridge questions, I was involved in discussion of names and/or wikipedia notability of MRA / MPS / etc. topics. Not sure if this one is wikipedia-notable, perhaps it seems like just an area survey, a specific study, not more meritorious than any other source with info about any NRHPs. Can the notability of this set be asserted? doncram ( talk) 04:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
That said, I would probably consider this notable without that history, as the Hudson Highlands are important in national history as well, and this MRA as a whole shows it.
And to repeat what I said earlier at WT:NRHP, I think we should only have separate MPS articles where the MPS crosses county lines (and has enough listings to justify an article: one of New York's "Movie Palaces of the Tri-Cities" has about one or two listings from Albany, Schenectady and Troy, not really enough for a separate article). MPSes that are listed in one county alone are better off discussed within the listings article for those counties (like, for instance, the Shawangunk Valley or Cornwall MRAs near where I live, where I've written about a number of the entries). Daniel Case ( talk) 16:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)