![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Hubble Ultra-Deep Field Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Hubble Ultra-Deep Field Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Hubble eXtreme Deep Field was copied or moved into Hubble Ultra-Deep Field with this edit on 02:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2012/37/image/c/
No idea how to upload, I'll leave that to someone else.
License appears to be public domain: http://hubblesite.org/about_us/copyright.php
More images: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2012/37/image/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.211.13.35 ( talk) 18:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
If you zoom in on the current 12.5-MB XDF image, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/Hubble_Extreme_Deep_Field_%28full_resolution%29.tif and compare to this portion of the Ultra Deep Field (UDF) image (released in 2004), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Hubble_Ultra_Deep_Field_part_d.jpg one could conclude that the XDF is inferior to the UDF. It isn't really, of course... the reduced-resolution copy on Wikimedia just makes it seem that way. 199.46.245.232 ( talk) 21:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hubble eXtreme Deep Field. BetelgeuSeginus ( talk) 22:59, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
What constellation was this photo taken in?-- Forward Unto Dawn 03:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Hubble Extreme Deep Field (full resolution).png will be appearing as picture of the day on February 6, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-02-06. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Can the capitalization of the article title and the text of the first paragraph be made to match? I don't want to run afoul of a WP policy on capitalization, so I am floating the suggestion but leaving the decision to someone else. thanks. Andrew Gradman talk/ WP:Hornbook 09:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Hubble Ultra-Deep Field Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Hubble Ultra-Deep Field Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Hubble eXtreme Deep Field was copied or moved into Hubble Ultra-Deep Field with this edit on 02:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2012/37/image/c/
No idea how to upload, I'll leave that to someone else.
License appears to be public domain: http://hubblesite.org/about_us/copyright.php
More images: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2012/37/image/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.211.13.35 ( talk) 18:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
If you zoom in on the current 12.5-MB XDF image, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/Hubble_Extreme_Deep_Field_%28full_resolution%29.tif and compare to this portion of the Ultra Deep Field (UDF) image (released in 2004), http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Hubble_Ultra_Deep_Field_part_d.jpg one could conclude that the XDF is inferior to the UDF. It isn't really, of course... the reduced-resolution copy on Wikimedia just makes it seem that way. 199.46.245.232 ( talk) 21:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hubble eXtreme Deep Field. BetelgeuSeginus ( talk) 22:59, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
What constellation was this photo taken in?-- Forward Unto Dawn 03:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Hubble Extreme Deep Field (full resolution).png will be appearing as picture of the day on February 6, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-02-06. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Can the capitalization of the article title and the text of the first paragraph be made to match? I don't want to run afoul of a WP policy on capitalization, so I am floating the suggestion but leaving the decision to someone else. thanks. Andrew Gradman talk/ WP:Hornbook 09:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)